Ultimate Blackjack [Moddable for custom text]

[Birichino]

Well, you could always up the max bet so players, win or lose (probably the latter), can do it faster.

[tyrion13]

na that ruins the build up

[MissedIt]

if you wanna lose so badly blow all your money on upgrades, then dont use them.

[Ryan-Drakel]

Well, you could always up the max bet so players, win or lose (probably the latter), can do it faster.

Wishful thinking but if ya wanna see dem vorish goodies... ya gotta WORK FOR THEM. [a crime, I know.]

[Journeyman]

Well, you could always up the max bet so players, win or lose (probably the latter), can do it faster.

Wishful thinking but if ya wanna see dem vorish goodies... ya gotta WORK FOR THEM. [a crime, I know.]

Absolutely

[0Anesthetic4u]

You know something I wondered about this game from the start?

Why is winning rewarded with Vore?

I can see the Gambler being forced to use their life as collateral, but why would a casino allow, na mandate, the deaths of their trained dealers, when they are in the postion of having all the power?

Wouldn't it make more sense if the dealer just had to strip?

It would make more logical sense, and it would avoid having to create awkard First Person vore sceens. Hell you could even go a The Witcher rout, and get Cards of the Various Dealers in Various Poses, something you can't realy do with a Vore sceen.

It doesn't realy hurt the game, the way it is, and I honestly allways think of how everything could be different or better all the time, so my opinion could easily be taken with a grain of salt, but I do think it makes more sense and offers more to achieve that way.

Who knows though, maybe someone already raised that point.

[DangZerglings]

You know something I wondered about this game from the start?

Why is winning rewarded with Vore?

I can see the Gambler being forced to use their life as collateral, but why would a casino allow, na mandate, the deaths of their trained dealers, when they are in the postion of having all the power?

Wouldn't it make more sense if the dealer just had to strip?

It would make more logical sense, and it would avoid having to create awkard First Person vore sceens. Hell you could even go a The Witcher rout, and get Cards of the Various Dealers in Various Poses, something you can't realy do with a Vore sceen.

It doesn't realy hurt the game, the way it is, and I honestly allways think of how everything could be different or better all the time, so my opinion could easily be taken with a grain of salt, but I do think it makes more sense and offers more to achieve that way.

Who knows though, maybe someone already raised that point.

Maybe reformations are added onto a bill that they have to pay off by being dealers. *shrug* Or they do a background check for digestion insurance, who knows.

[maleperduis]

You know something I wondered about this game from the start?

Why is winning rewarded with Vore?

I can see the Gambler being forced to use their life as collateral, but why would a casino allow, na mandate, the deaths of their trained dealers, when they are in the postion of having all the power?

Wouldn't it make more sense if the dealer just had to strip?

It would make more logical sense, and it would avoid having to create awkard First Person vore sceens. Hell you could even go a The Witcher rout, and get Cards of the Various Dealers in Various Poses, something you can't realy do with a Vore sceen.

It doesn't realy hurt the game, the way it is, and I honestly allways think of how everything could be different or better all the time, so my opinion could easily be taken with a grain of salt, but I do think it makes more sense and offers more to achieve that way.

Who knows though, maybe someone already raised that point.

Well this is a vore game, so having vore scenes is an end unto itself. You could make it even more realistic by having the dealers not eat the players either, but then what would be the point?

[ConsumptionZ]

You know something I wondered about this game from the start?

Why is winning rewarded with Vore?

I can see the Gambler being forced to use their life as collateral, but why would a casino allow, na mandate, the deaths of their trained dealers, when they are in the postion of having all the power?

Wouldn't it make more sense if the dealer just had to strip?

It would make more logical sense, and it would avoid having to create awkard First Person vore sceens. Hell you could even go a The Witcher rout, and get Cards of the Various Dealers in Various Poses, something you can't realy do with a Vore sceen.

It doesn't realy hurt the game, the way it is, and I honestly allways think of how everything could be different or better all the time, so my opinion could easily be taken with a grain of salt, but I do think it makes more sense and offers more to achieve that way.

Who knows though, maybe someone already raised that point.

You're overthinking a vore-focused game, relax.

[GREGOLE]

I happen to love the first person vore scene, and the dealer's adorable nervousness as she realizes how close she is to losing, and the speculation raised by the idea of a casino where the dealers often get eaten by the players.

[shadownaga]

Hehe I found my first ever exploit in a game...

mmm... haven't lost a single game... god shes a tasty meal :-3

[Journeyman]

shadownaga, ooh, awesome!!! Would you PM me about it? I wonder if it's the one I know about... XD I accidentally left a kinda large one in there!

[Liz]

You know something I wondered about this game from the start?

Why is winning rewarded with Vore?

I can see the Gambler being forced to use their life as collateral, but why would a casino allow, na mandate, the deaths of their trained dealers, when they are in the postion of having all the power?

Wouldn't it make more sense if the dealer just had to strip?

It would make more logical sense, and it would avoid having to create awkard First Person vore sceens. Hell you could even go a The Witcher rout, and get Cards of the Various Dealers in Various Poses, something you can't realy do with a Vore sceen.

It doesn't realy hurt the game, the way it is, and I honestly allways think of how everything could be different or better all the time, so my opinion could easily be taken with a grain of salt, but I do think it makes more sense and offers more to achieve that way.

Who knows though, maybe someone already raised that point.

You're overthinking a vore-focused game, relax.

Indeed, some people enjoy a vorish setting where failure = ending up food ^^

[Ryan-Drakel]

Hehe I found my first ever exploit in a game...

mmm... haven't lost a single game... god shes a tasty meal :-3

Now you have me curious...

[0Anesthetic4u]

Indeed, some people enjoy a vorish setting where failure = ending up food ^^

Thats not what I said.

Failure resulting in Vore is fine. I though Victory being rewarded with Vore was strange, considering that I would assume that cosinos would be unwilling to lose their trained dealers, so while you are forced to use your life as colateral, the dealers would not be subject to the same rules.

[Liz]

Indeed, some people enjoy a vorish setting where failure = ending up food ^^

Thats not what I said.

Failure resulting in Vore is fine. I though Victory being rewarded with Vore was strange, considering that I would assume that cosinos would be unwilling to lose their trained dealers, so while you are forced to use your life as colateral, the dealers would not be subject to the same rules.

Not really the stakes are high and they would employ more women to work for them who know the risk and are paid high if they win. Over thinking the setting ^^

[replicatkd]

Thats not what I said.

Failure resulting in Vore is fine. I though Victory being rewarded with Vore was strange, considering that I would assume that cosinos would be unwilling to lose their trained dealers, so while you are forced to use your life as colateral, the dealers would not be subject to the same rules.

Why would someone be foolish enough to risk getting eaten by the dealer, if the dealer gets a slap on the wrist for losing?

Would you bet your 1,000,000 dollars to get a key accessory?

High bets = High rewards.

[0Anesthetic4u]

Thats not what I said.

Failure resulting in Vore is fine. I though Victory being rewarded with Vore was strange, considering that I would assume that cosinos would be unwilling to lose their trained dealers, so while you are forced to use your life as colateral, the dealers would not be subject to the same rules.

Why would someone be foolish enough to risk getting eaten by the dealer, if the dealer gets a slap on the wrist for losing?

Would you bet your 1,000,000 dollars to get a key accessory?

High bets = High rewards.

Do you not get how colateral works?

People lose their cars and their houses, all the time.

When you bet your house, you don't expect to win the dealer's house. You expect it to count for your houses value against the dealer, or the other players bets.

Aside from that a Dealer doesn't run out of money to bet, they are accesed to the entirety of the Casinos cash, meaning imposing arbitrary limits to how much cash the Dealer can use, would be intentional by the Casino, which I can only see them doing if Player victory didn't cost them gravely.

You think the odds for the player are bad? It would be a death sentance for the dealers. Yes the dealers would win more then they lose, because thats how casinos make their money, but ALL Dealers lose every single day, some of the time.

Your life would work the same. Counting for cash in a bet.

And a casino absolutely would not be willing to lose their trained dealers, because they casinos want MAXIMUM profits. Training another Dealers 1 takes time, 2 Takes Money, and 3 Costs money because of inexperainced dealers making mistakes.

I am not over thinking this. This was one of the very first things that stuck out to me, aside from it being Hard as Balls.

Again I'm not criticising the game, I'm just saying that that mechanic has a serious logical falicy.

[replicatkd]

And a casino absolutely would not be willing to lose their trained dealers, because they casinos want MAXIMUM profits. Training another Dealers 1 takes time, 2 Takes Money, and 3 Costs money because of inexperainced dealers making mistakes.

Oh Yeah. I totally forgot about the Casinos inherent advantage and profit mentality since they are the ones that have to provide the money you expect to win. I guess this casino is super rich then. Haha.

[wierdo2000]

i would really love to know how to beat her, i wanna eat her, :>