Eka wrote:I'm sure there are tons of opinions what qualifies for real life vore and what doesn't. But I don't really care what everyone else think. In this site, my definition is the law. All other definition are invalid.
I'm asking sincerely and without intending to be rude, but what was your incentive to ban RL vore from the website? I understand that you have the power to do it, but I was wondering if this is just a personal belief or something that reflects the views of the community. Are we allowed to poll on the community's opinion on the allowability of RL vore or were there any polls on this already? It might help to see where everyone else stands on the issue so that we won't all be frustrated with each other.
I'm asking this because all of your site rules are very well reasoned, but rule #1 seems to be a restrictive measure without any stated explanation that others can sympathize with.
Vincer wrote:So you basically don't care if an animal dies (a terrible death as well) for the sole purpose of getting your rocks off?
Let's not go here.. we're all guilty of that kind of stuff. We all eat chicken, and none of us really much care how they're killed (well, except the Jewish). None of us really have to eat chicken at all, we just do it because we like it. Maybe if our society allowed it, we'd be getting sexual pleasure from killing chickens, but it wouldn't make it any more wrong in terms of killing. In short, we kill chickens because we like it, whether it's because of the taste or some sexual value. If to some RL hamster vore is appealing let them have their opinions.