sinsnail wrote:'what's the difference between people who are bi-curious and heteroflexible'.
as i understand it, curiosity is more like "questioning"
sinsnail wrote:'what's the difference between people who are bi-curious and heteroflexible'.
Avereth wrote:I have noticed there may be an increased rate of vore interest in asexuals, heck my roommate is one and likes vore, and I've spoken to a good number more in the same boat, but it's hard to know if it's just coincidence or not.
Eznam wrote:Oniric wrote:It's funny that I always forget that those "flexible" terms exist since that's probably what' best describes me (homoflexible, I guess). I'm attracted to males 99% of the time, but since I'm not oppossed to the idea of finding women (or other genders) attractive sometimes I've described myself as bi or pan. I could totally see myself having sex with a girl under some bizarre circumstance, even if I'm not usually aroused by the female body. But in the end I decided it's just easier for everybody if I just say I'm gay (since he HAVE to label ourselves and stuff) since that's true most of the time.
But hey, I once jacked off to lesbian porn so I guess I can't be totally gay, right? xD
Wouldn't that just be homosexual/biromantic? Maybe I don't understand the romantic aspect of that statement.
Oniric wrote:Eznam wrote:Oniric wrote:It's funny that I always forget that those "flexible" terms exist since that's probably what' best describes me (homoflexible, I guess). I'm attracted to males 99% of the time, but since I'm not oppossed to the idea of finding women (or other genders) attractive sometimes I've described myself as bi or pan. I could totally see myself having sex with a girl under some bizarre circumstance, even if I'm not usually aroused by the female body. But in the end I decided it's just easier for everybody if I just say I'm gay (since he HAVE to label ourselves and stuff) since that's true most of the time.
But hey, I once jacked off to lesbian porn so I guess I can't be totally gay, right? xD
Wouldn't that just be homosexual/biromantic? Maybe I don't understand the romantic aspect of that statement.
Oh, I wasn't even taking romance into the equation, I was just thinking of sexual attraction. Sexuality is an spectrum, that's why I think labels are useful to describe ourselves but they shouldn't limit us. I'm very gay in both the romantic and the sexual axes, I just don't think I'm at the extreme end of that spectrum. Theoretically speaking, at least. I've never done anything sexual (or romantic) with a woman.
Eznam wrote:But if you can't get hard to girls then you're not sexually attracted to girls so technically any attraction you have to them would be romantic.
Eznam wrote:But if you can't get hard to girls then you're not sexually attracted to girls so technically any attraction you have to them would be romantic.
Vae wrote:Oh shit! Ace represent!\
Not used to Asexuality being so widespread, but I suppose this is the community I should've expected. Y'all are my people.
Sexual orientation (gray) asexual. Fetish stuff is 98% of my attraction. person + person sex is meh, but it doesnt disgust me. still do it occasionally if the mood is right.
Romantics: Panromantic, heavily leaning Lesbian (could be exposure bias, because most guys i meet have been scum.)
Does any of this translate to vore preferences? who knows. lemme throw those out as well for anybody who's keeping tally
Vore pref: Pred/Prey switch, Leaning solidly Pred until a better one comes to take my place. Any gender partner is fine, but (see "Romantics:) Oral vore > Female specific (UB &/or BV) > AV > male specifc. Digesiton/absorbtion is preffered.
Eznam wrote:Because honestly pred and prey is really just a question of dominant or submissive that applies to everything about a person.
jaggedjagd wrote:Eznam wrote:We look more into what's appealing rather than situational preferences. Because honestly pred and prey is really just a question of dominant or submissive that applies to everything about a person.
Not really sure I can follow your statement, but I am very sure that Dom/Sub tendencies can be absolutely situational. There may be people who have been strict sub their entire life but one day find a partner that helps them discover their hidden dom side. And preference for being pred/prey is not necessarily tied directly to dom/sub preference. Dominant prey exists just as submissive pred exists.
Eznam wrote:Just because a pred isn't necessarily dominant and a prey isn't necessarily submissive doesn't mean that the pred and prey thing isn't purely about dominance and submission.
sinsnail wrote:Erastus wrote:ok... but it's not. dom/sub mentality isn't required for vore at all, and even people who are into both may switch roles for one but not the other.
Yeah, I gotta agree with this. While most of the time prey is sub, and pred is dom (and that's just fine), it's not exactly the same. For example, pred characters can be submissive to their prey or their observer especially when the vore is unwilling or forced onto the pred. Just because a pred eats doesn't mean they're in control or in the position of power unlike in say, BDSM, where the dom is always dominant and is the one calling the shots/orchestrating the mind games/carrying out forceful actions onto the submissive. As others have mentioned a sub can switch between a prey and pred role but still be submissive, the same can be true for a dom.
Sometimes sub/dom features are just completely absent from vore, especially when the prey is ambiguous or doesn't matter in a cyclical structure of nature or survival or the fittest sort of way and it's just the pred eating because they gotta rather than as a flaunting of power/control.
Return to General Vore Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], EagleEye, Jimmeyboy117, soth_87