Eka's Portal

RediQ wrote:

sinsnail wrote:Quite interesting that (at the time of me taking the poll anyway) that quite a lot of people here are actually asexual. Honestly interests me what the main attraction to vore for ace people is if it isn't for sexual purposes (or maybe it is and it's just irl people don't do it for them - I dunno, I'd love to know really). It would be interesting to know the gender ratios too but as OP said, that would make way for too many polling categories.

Aesexual people can totally still have fetishes and kinks and stuff, even if they're disinterested in sex itself and/or not aroused by real people's bodies.

I think he means that a 1% of the population sexual orientation has 20% in vore.

Oh! Yeah, fair question.

Where's my obligatory "Often" option?

What's important for people to understand is asexual is a broad term, it can mean different things for different people.
Most of those asexual votes probably still like vore in a sexual manner, they are just not attracted to the people doing it, or something along those lines. They can correct me if I'm wrong but something tells me while asexual is a loose term, some folks are using it even more loosely.

deleted

i hit "straight" 'cause there was no "heteroflexible" option ;Y

Erastus wrote:i hit "straight" 'cause there was no "heteroflexible" option ;Y

Isn't that just bi?

Eznam wrote:Isn't that just bi?

naw cuz bi would mean having a distinct attraction to both sexes (with or without a preference), while flexibility means still generally only being attracted to one sex while being open to rare exceptions or to encounters with the non-preferred sex in which attraction need not be present.

Asexual here. I have a lot of personal libido, but I'm just not interested in other people. Faces don't matter to me, gender's kind of whatever outside of females being weird because I'm not female, and I don't see any reason for sex when my hand is perfectly useful and easier.

But hoo boy, vore really does it for me. Most of why it does it for me is more based upon the reasons for doing it and power dynamics, the inevitability, the sense of nature taking its course. And while I don't care about features in a regular human sense, I am very attracted to...shall we say, predatory features, which is probably what made me get deep into furry territory. Give me a nice set of drooling, tooth filled jaws and a muscular physique meant for overpowering your prey and it's just very appealing to me. It's the only way I can see another entity as appealing, often in the sense of wanting to be them, or at least see them using that body to eat something else. I feel like i admire a predator's body in a similar way to say, how ancient Greeks participated in the Olympics in the nude. Basically as a showcase of perfection to be admired, even yearn to attain such perfection yourself.

In a roleplay environment I'm willing to relax my no sex rules slightly, though not to the point of anything more than non-anal activities, though it helps that I'm not actually performing the act in reality and can just focus on the idea of it instead on top of it involving a predatory figure as part of their enjoying the vore process.

I have noticed there may be an increased rate of vore interest in asexuals, heck my roommate is one and likes vore, and I've spoken to a good number more in the same boat, but it's hard to know if it's just coincidence or not.

I am a girl that loves other girls. While I've little interest in sex, I choose not to define my relationships based on that either. I could call myself asexual or I could not, because my attraction to girls is very real and yet I wouldn't do something people would consider normal sex. But the intimacy of vore is hard to ignore when both people are into it. So really, either label could fit depending on perspective.

I prefer to just call myself a lesbian who's not into sex, personally.

deleted

.......................................

I'm actually not surprised by the numbers here. I can also relate to a lot of comments that I like to keep things to the imagination which is what makes the whole vorarephilia thing happen.

i was pretty interested in the sexual demographic of this site too! the results are pretty interesting. i have a confusing libido that comes and goes, pretty hard to exactly label, but i do like dudes. vore itself is erotic, and anything gross related to vore is attractive. but the thing is, for example, post-vore-scat is just fine, though a scat fetish involving actually interacting with the shit is a big no-no, i'd rather avoid it completely. sex itself i'm in a grey area about, depends on how it's written or drawn, but anal sex before anal vore is golden in all scenarios.

selfrog wrote:You could probably say that is just a more specific sub-category of bi though, I would think.

i don't think having one or two exceptions is enough to consider someone as being generally attracted to a certain gender, but you're free to define labels your own way.

I'm a straight male. I have experimented with my sexuality and kissed a few guys when I was younger , once while shit faced drunk. Anyways it did nothing for me and I can definitely confirm that I am straight.

...

It's funny that I always forget that those "flexible" terms exist since that's probably what' best describes me (homoflexible, I guess). I'm attracted to males 99% of the time, but since I'm not oppossed to the idea of finding women (or other genders) attractive sometimes I've described myself as bi or pan. I could totally see myself having sex with a girl under some bizarre circumstance, even if I'm not usually aroused by the female body. But in the end I decided it's just easier for everybody if I just say I'm gay (since he HAVE to label ourselves and stuff) since that's true most of the time.

But hey, I once jacked off to lesbian porn so I guess I can't be totally gay, right? xD

Oniric wrote:It's funny that I always forget that those "flexible" terms exist since that's probably what' best describes me (homoflexible, I guess). I'm attracted to males 99% of the time, but since I'm not oppossed to the idea of finding women (or other genders) attractive sometimes I've described myself as bi or pan. I could totally see myself having sex with a girl under some bizarre circumstance, even if I'm not usually aroused by the female body. But in the end I decided it's just easier for everybody if I just say I'm gay (since he HAVE to label ourselves and stuff) since that's true most of the time.

But hey, I once jacked off to lesbian porn so I guess I can't be totally gay, right? xD

Wouldn't that just be homosexual/biromantic? Maybe I don't understand the romantic aspect of that statement.

I'm nonbinary, biromantic and asexual.
I like vore, but I don't find it arousing or hot. I just enjoy it.