Page 1 of 2

For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 10:10 pm
by GastricAztec
What’s your opinion on teen giantess vore? Some people think people under 18 shouldn’t be depicted in fetish material, but others remember having the fetish at that age and think younger voraphiles should have options for giantess vore in their age group.

What do you think about teen giantess vore?

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 10:43 pm
by PlasmaTech225
Well, underage nudity definitely crosses the line, but vore itself isn't a big issue. There are a lot of instances of giants eating people in kids' stories, anyways.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2018 4:43 am
by Merodi
Well, I don't like giantesses, but I do like giants, so I guess that counts too?
Anyways, I'm extremely against using real teenagers (including celebrities) for fetish montages or fics, that's an absolute no-go and gross as fuck. In fiction, with fictional characters, I think it's fine, though.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2018 7:11 am
by Rivenscry
As a prey, I don't get a decision on who eats me. If I did, I'd be far from the subservient personality that controls my fetish and real side.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2018 10:44 am
by Darjus
I don't understand the fuss about it: to them, and to society, this is not pornography.
Even explicit drawings and 3d models of underage nudes are not prosecutables, go figure written stories or non pornographic fetishes.
In addition, often teens and pre-teens tend to be obsessively cruel or protective toward peers and critters, making them very likely as preds.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2018 12:21 pm
by MechaSharkZilla
Merodi wrote:Anyways, I'm extremely against using real teenagers (including celebrities) for fetish montages or fics, that's an absolute no-go and gross as fuck. In fiction, with fictional characters, I think it's fine, though.


I know this is slightly off-topic, but I honestly think vore with real people at all is... Icky. But I feel the same way about any erotica made depicting real people without their consent, so, yeah.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2018 8:53 pm
by minakotomoka14
I personally don't like giantesses, but I don't see a problem with it as long as real people aren't involved. On paper, you're free to draw or write whatever the hell you want. But real-life stuff, especially sexual stuff with minors, definitely crosses a line.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2018 4:20 am
by Jayezox
Teenagers shouldn't be encouraged to be into this stuff. That's corrupting a minor. Also, minors are not allowed on this site and fetish material on other sites where they are allowed (DeviantArt for example) should have a mature rating. I'm not a psychologist, but from what I've researched porn in general can be addictive like alcohol or drugs and the more unusual stuff has been shown to take away interest in watching normal sexual behavior. For us adults, this stuff is okay in moderation, but minors who are undeveloped should not be viewing it. A lot of online dictionaries describe porn as causing sexual arousal so even vore with no nudes and an erotic pose or something like that is porn by definition.

As for artwork and stuff, I'm against it, but I'll leave it at that since I haven't really learned too much information about it. I also know this will cause a debate that I don't want to get into. The main reason I avoid this topic is it disturbs me so much that I tend to avoid it.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2018 12:25 pm
by leriodenbron
For me, vore is an exclusively sexual thing, so it feels weird if anyone underage is involved, even as prey, even if there's no nudity. It takes me right out of it, especially if there's any kind of familial connection because like, I have siblings and they're the last people I would want in the room if I'm doing anything sexual

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2018 11:51 am
by GastricAztec
leriodenbron wrote:For me, vore is an exclusively sexual thing, so it feels weird if anyone underage is involved, even as prey, even if there's no nudity. It takes me right out of it, especially if there's any kind of familial connection because like, I have siblings and they're the last people I would want in the room if I'm doing anything sexual


I was talking about teen giantesses as preds

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2018 6:09 pm
by Scrumptious
Jayezox wrote:Teenagers shouldn't be encouraged to be into this stuff. That's corrupting a minor. Also, minors are not allowed on this site and fetish material on other sites where they are allowed (DeviantArt for example) should have a mature rating. I'm not a psychologist, but from what I've researched porn in general can be addictive like alcohol or drugs and the more unusual stuff has been shown to take away interest in watching normal sexual behavior. For us adults, this stuff is okay in moderation, but minors who are undeveloped should not be viewing it. A lot of online dictionaries describe porn as causing sexual arousal so even vore with no nudes and an erotic pose or something like that is porn by definition.


I'm also not a psychologist, but I wonder if that's really the reason for the taboo. The danger that the taboos in questions are supposed to combat, it seems to me, is that children become the victims of sexual violence or/and exploitation. Child pornography is a huge crime because the subjects of the photographs are directly exploited. Also, pornography is gateway to physical exploitation and human trafficking in children (ie. the industry in one might be supportive of trafficking - since the subjects of the photographs may have already fallen into the hands of traffickers, and the photographs might serve as a form of advertisement).

I don't believe that the legal taboos extend to the fictitious - ie. drawn images and imagined stories. According to the US Department of Justice, it's about visual material that is or looks real.
US Department of Justice wrote:United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. (source)

So, fantasy stories may be legal (in the United States, but laws may be similar in other jurisdictions) because they do not depict reality by image capture or mimicry, and they do not identify a real individual (though, some stories might), I think it's still dangerous ground. It may be close enough for many people - juries, legislators, prosecutors, and the voting public - which means that it's probably not a good idea to test the proposition.

The secondary threat, that I imagine the taboos exist to thwart, is that adults develop urges towards minors that may lead them to act upon those urges. While I think that the social taboos (ie. deep social disapproval and ostracism, as opposed to legal prosecution and criminal punishment) may have some effect in turning minds elsewhere, it might also be a source of excitement for some. Yet, the fantasy stories might direct the minds of people who could fall into a desire for actual child victimization.

Anyway, this whole discussion might be beyond the intent of the OP, but it's one that is probably triggered by any topic that relates to minors.

TL;DR: fantasy teen giantesses (or teen giants) are probably okay, so long as they do not too closely resemble real people who are, or might be, threatened in body, mind, or reputation. However, it is still something about which you might want to be careful, since there is less than zero tolerance for anything remotely resembling sex and children.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2018 6:13 pm
by xmarkx
I'm not a giantess fan but I can sure tell you that I don't tolerate anyone under 18 or appearing to look under 18 in fetish work of any kind

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2018 11:03 pm
by GastricAztec
Darjus wrote:I don't understand the fuss about it: to them, and to society, this is not pornography.
Even explicit drawings and 3d models of underage nudes are not prosecutables, go figure written stories or non pornographic fetishes.
In addition, often teens and pre-teens tend to be obsessively cruel or protective toward peers and critters, making them very likely as preds.


I agree that teens make good preds, girls are more evil at that age, before they have developed a deeper sense of morality. College age is a good age for giantess preds, also.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2018 11:19 pm
by Seelane
SamuelOrona wrote:What’s your opinion on teen giantess vore? Some people think people under 18 shouldn’t be depicted in fetish material, but others remember having the fetish at that age and think younger voraphiles should have options for giantess vore in their age group.

What do you think about teen giantess vore?



Doing non-sexual underage vore seem fine, I was into vore way before I even considered sexual, I remember searching the internet for monsters/people swallowing others whole. There's already a safe vore forum on Eka-Portal,I also think that a more family friendly vore site could also help the image of vore in general...

However, if we are talking about sexual underage content, then I do not morally approve as at that point this is Pedophilia. I do not personally approve non-safe works, but we are on the internet and I also think that you can do whatever you want. Just post it in the underage forum or tag it as underage so that it do not disturb the majority and it should be fine.

It can also depend of the country as it follow the age of consent. For exemple, teenagers in sexual content in japan is totally fine as the age consent is 13+, in most countries the age of consent is 16+ like Canada and Russia. If you want to know more about it, just check wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2018 11:37 pm
by Silversepiroth
Even if it's not sexual, it's still erotic. I say no. Unless that "teen" has the word eight or nine in front of it, it's a no-go

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2018 5:09 am
by 7x7
Fictional characters, and no nude pics. Other than that, vore isn't that explicit.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2018 8:11 am
by Wolfsage
Honestly, teens are my favorite prey, and since it is only fiction, I don't see the problem.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2018 11:12 am
by Seelane
Silversepiroth wrote:Even if it's not sexual, it's still erotic. I say no. Unless that "teen" has the word eight or nine in front of it, it's a no-go

1. I know this sound strange but vore isn't just an erotic fetish.

2. The age of consent is 16 in most countries, not 18 and definitely not 19.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2018 11:43 pm
by GastricAztec
My own personal view on it is I can’t understand why there isn’t more of it in mainstream movies and television. They can make a film about monsters but they can’t make one about a teenage girl rampaging and devouring people.

They should’ve made ten movies like this by now. Zombies and vampires have always been popular, I just don’t understand why giant girls swallowing people has yet to catch on in mainstream comic books and films.

Re: For or against teen giantess vore?

PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 2:21 am
by MechaSharkZilla
SamuelOrona wrote:I just don’t understand why giant girls swallowing people has yet to catch on in mainstream comic books and films.


We got a bit close with Giganta from DC, but no cigar. :(
Spoiler: show
Image