The people that like male predators

by **157and493** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:33 am

First and foremost I need to say this: I have absolutely no problem with people liking male predators, I just wanted to ask a few questions because I am curious about somethings.

I personally am a heterosexual man and I can enjoy only F/M vore or occasionally F/F vore. I assume that most heterosexual men who are submissive enjoy F/M vore, and the ones who are dominant enjoy M/F vore.
However, I have talked to guys who say they are straight and yet they enjoy M/M vore. Initially I thought the only ones who enjoy M/M vore would be heterosexual women or homosexual men, but evidently I was wrong about that.
I do not want to sound rude or insensitive, but I am genuinely curious about why a guy would like M/M vore if he is straight.

I realize there is probably no polite way to ask this without offending anyone, but I am honestly just curious about this, no offense is intended.

by **Hanzo** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:38 am

Cause, sometimes you gotta take what you can get. Gotta be like a vulture when you're looking for something that you want when it comes to stuff like this.

by **LittleRover** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:57 am

Quite simply it's because there are so many other factors to vore than sex. There are enough people on here who enjoy the idea of vore in a non sexual way to show it can be about compassion or dominance or any particular scenario they revel in. It might also just be a kink for the scenario a bit like how cuckolding can cause an interest in particular males.

Just my two pence. =3

by **Jaxed** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:37 am

Hanzo wrote:Cause, sometimes you gotta take what you can get. Gotta be like a vulture when you're looking for something that you want when it comes to stuff like this.

To add to this, I think there's a lot more m/m than m/f, especially if you can also enjoy furry porn, so straight male preds do have a hard time finding stuff. And even the straight male pred stuff is almost all macro/micro. So if you're a male pred wanting samesize, you pretty much have to go furry m/m.

by **Greedyy** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 6:04 am

LittleRover wrote:Quite simply it's because there are so many other factors to vore than sex. There are enough people on here who enjoy the idea of vore in a non sexual way to show it can be about compassion or dominance or any particular scenario they revel in. It might also just be a kink for the scenario a bit like how cuckolding can cause an interest in particular males.

Just my two pence. =3

Yep, mostly this!
Also, since some of us are not exclusively into human and/or humanoid/anthro predators, the gender really doesn't matter when it comes to feral predators.

by **Merodi** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 6:44 am

Some straight guys simple identify as preds and don't really care for the prey's gender. And some people see their vore as completely non-sexual and just prefer it to be with guys.
And of course, there's bi guys who just... like it too.

by **someoneoncenew** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 8:15 am

Merodi wrote:Some straight guys simple identify as preds and don't really care for the prey's gender. And some people see their vore as completely non-sexual and just prefer it to be with guys.
And of course, there's bi guys who just... like it too.

As a bi male, I have specific kinks/interests that are exclusive to my attraction to women, and specific kinks/interests exclusive to my attraction to men. In the latter case, it just happens to be that I'm into macro vore where other guys are the pred/giant. There's no clear explanation that I can think of for it, so I just accept it for what it is. So I'd have to agree with that last sentence you wrote :lol:

by **DiAnna** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 8:36 am

It's hard for me to go into the mind of a straight man, but I suppose the reasons are almost identical for my own reasons to love and adore male predators of any shape, form or species. I believe it has to do with the dominance part of it. It is usually the case that males are more physically imposing than females. Alpha men, showing dominance, winning over competition, making lesser people do their bidding. These ideas can be purely non sexual, but to have an accent on the strong vs weak scenario.

A straight guy might not view a male pred in a sexual way, but they might view it as a stronger being, forcing them to their will. In many ways, vore can be the ultimate domination/submission. So if a person purely seeks non-sexual dominance or submission, then the gender should not matter. But due to media, males with muscles or harsher personalities seems very fitting choices for the dominant part of a fantasy scenario.

Exclusive male predators are also pretty rare, so this might also be another reason for some who might enjoy the idea of doing something less common once in awhile. Or some might simply enjoy vore as in the act. A predator who simply wants to satisfy their hunger or dominant cravings just take what they can - again speaking in a non-sexual way, purely as in 'food has no gender'. When you eat your meat meal I doubt it that you start carrying if it was a male or female pig from which the steak was made.

Or from a straight male prey view, they might simply enjoy looking at tongues or stomachs and since there is no difference in the way internals look, gender might not matter for them.

If it is sexual, then these heterosexual men might just have some other kinks - like enjoying femboys, as in their heads - they view them as females in looks.

The human brain is very complex thing. Asking why males enjoy other males is like asking why we enjoy vore in the first place - we simply do

by **SiHiUiLiSiEi** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:25 am

Additionally to the already stated fact that it's just not about sex for plenty of vorephiles, I want to hit on a point that I see conflated alot in environments where people are trying to box sexuality around 'but you did this thing', not to accuse. A very, perhaps the most, sensible reaction for a straight person, towards a homosexual encounter, is indifference, not disgust. Not to blame anybody for having a harsh reaction, considering that the way society has conditioned many of us is to view sexuality as the kind of thing that is wholly gross and vile unless you're actively in the mood for and participating in it; but a straight person could wholly participate in a homosexual activity the same way that an asexual person could in any sexual practice. You don't have to love to dance to go through the motions - particularly if you're enjoying something else about the encounter, idea, what-have-you. There's an immense space for sexuality that, without verging into non-consent, is simply allowing. Some people just don't have those hangups - not that there's anything 'wrong' with having them. If it makes you uncomfortable for any reason, no one should force you to go there, of course.

To venture all the way to an extreme here, a male who even has sex with another male, without feeling any sort of erotic stimulation from it, wouldn't just 'be' gay, despite doing something that 'is' gay without question. That's like saying that just because you saw somebody in a store means they love that store, or more extremely, that that's the only store they'd shop at. Some people are going to be embarrassed to shop there, or maybe have any other reason for avoiding the establishment, maybe they just really do dislike it. But for some people, rather than being a store that they prefer, or even like, it can be 'just a store'. It's not their favorite store, they have no prevailing feelings about the location whatsoever. They'll go there if there's something they want there, without any fixation on how that makes them look to people who have an opinion about 'people who shop there'.

by **masterofvore1** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 2:40 pm

SiHiUiLiSiEi wrote:Additionally to the already stated fact that it's just not about sex for plenty of vorephiles, I want to hit on a point that I see conflated alot in environments where people are trying to box sexuality around 'but you did this thing', not to accuse. A very, perhaps the most, sensible reaction for a straight person, towards a homosexual encounter, is indifference, not disgust. Not to blame anybody for having a harsh reaction, considering that the way society has conditioned many of us is to view sexuality as the kind of thing that is wholly gross and vile unless you're actively in the mood for and participating in it; but a straight person could wholly participate in a homosexual activity the same way that an asexual person could in any sexual practice. You don't have to love to dance to go through the motions - particularly if you're enjoying something else about the encounter, idea, what-have-you. There's an immense space for sexuality that, without verging into non-consent, is simply allowing. Some people just don't have those hangups - not that there's anything 'wrong' with having them. If it makes you uncomfortable for any reason, no one should force you to go there, of course.

To venture all the way to an extreme here, a male who even has sex with another male, without feeling any sort of erotic stimulation from it, wouldn't just 'be' gay, despite doing something that 'is' gay without question. That's like saying that just because you saw somebody in a store means they love that store, or more extremely, that that's the only store they'd shop at. Some people are going to be embarrassed to shop there, or maybe have any other reason for avoiding the establishment, maybe they just really do dislike it. But for some people, rather than being a store that they prefer, or even like, it can be 'just a store'. It's not their favorite store, they have no prevailing feelings about the location whatsoever. They'll go there if there's something they want there, without any fixation on how that makes them look to people who have an opinion about 'people who shop there'.

(I agree)
I've noticed the "if you do x, then you're y" thing. it drives people crazy, because they're constantly trying to prove who they are to the point where they can't be open and have fun with anything in case someone might see it and decide they're not who they want to be. so possibly ironically a "I judge because I don't want to be judged". that might not be an easy thing to overcome if conditioned,even if someone wanted to,or they might be unaware; but yet it perpetuates the theme.
on the topic of vore and sex,among a few other things, I've seen people come in with a firey "the only reason anyone would ever think about x is for sexual reasons" and they are very adamant about it. that causes some issues when absorbing a larger band of content that might not necessarily be explicitly sexual. because then you have issues that would come up if it was exclusively a sexual act towards another live person, and they cannot(or won't) realize it's their filter,not a law of reality- in a sense imposing their preference on others and then complaining that random people and things caught up in that net are wrong and "impure" only because they've decided to interpret it that way,and projecting that everyone must interpret it that way because they do. I think some exploration can be done if fantasy can reasonably be compartmentalized, realizing each parts satisfy something, but isn't necessarily disastrously wrong or harmful,nor preconceptually destined to cause harm, nor that anyone who does harm in it's name is a guarantee that that subject can only be used to cause harm. And if who you are informs your choices rather than only instantaneous thought/action, and is something more steady, then you have the power to alter your path, and not have to be 100% for or against a particular thing in order to use a portion of it.

by **Humbug** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 3:33 pm

Some people also find the act itself to be sexually arousing, and the gender of the participants is either less important or not important at all. I used to be that way, actually, but gender has over the years become more and more important to me for some reason.

by **Dekkard2** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 3:44 pm

If a man eats another man he becomes twice more a man

by **Houyo** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 3:55 pm

I have no intention of fucking a dude so I'm straight, but the fantasy of being a ravenous monster who eats the fuck out of anything and anyone is fun.

by **jaggedjagd** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:27 pm

.......................................

by **GastricAztec** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:28 pm

I am only interested in a male pred if he is accompanied by a female, I identify as prey. When I realize I’m reading a story about a giant male with no female pred, I stop reading; but for some reason, if it is a guy and a girl, such as a brother and sister for instance, or a guy and his girlfriend, then it interests me.

I identify as heterosexual male, so I don’t understand why I would be interested in this type of thing, but I am.

by **coop500** » Sat Jan 12, 2019 11:50 pm

Darn, the title got me excited but the OP just wants guy answers *slinks back to her forum nosing*

by **gullvy** » Sun Jan 13, 2019 4:26 pm

Am male IRL. Pred only. I enjoy all combos of genders except H/m, M/h and F/h.

I play preds of all genders, but I do have a preference for playing male preds. I guess I'm, like, 85 % heterosexual. I can certainly see that other men can be sexy, and even sexually attractive, but I do not have any romantic attraction to other men. When RPing, though, it's a lot easier to do M/m play - even with sex - even though I probably wouldn't have sex with a male in real life. Since roleplaying happens at a distance to our real person, it's a lot easier to experiment with - and enjoy! - things that you probably wouldn't enjoy IRL.

by **dragonjerky** » Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:05 pm

Greedyy wrote:Also, since some of us are not exclusively into human and/or humanoid/anthro predators, the gender really doesn't matter when it comes to feral predators.

I came here to utter essentially the same sentiment. For me, personally, vore isn't about sexualizing the pred. I don't really care about pred gender. In my preferences, vore is about what the prey experiences being consumed and ultimately ending up in the stomach. It's the sensations from what that might be like where I derive my enjoyment/arousal. All throats and stomachs are basically the same. No need for me to worry about the gender they're attached to.

by **minakotomoka14** » Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:25 am

coop500 wrote:Darn, the title got me excited but the OP just wants guy answers *slinks back to her forum nosing*

Yeah, me too, for a second there I thought we were going to see a substantial conversation. I suppose there just aren't any girls into vore that identify as prey and like to see M/F or M/M then.

by **Chameleonette** » Wed Jan 16, 2019 12:02 pm

minakotomoka14 wrote:
coop500 wrote:Darn, the title got me excited but the OP just wants guy answers *slinks back to her forum nosing*

Yeah, me too, for a second there I thought we were going to see a substantial conversation. I suppose there just aren't any girls into vore that identify as prey and like to see M/F or M/M then.

Make your own threads instead of complaining that someone didn't post what you wanted to talk about? Seriously, there's just no need to respond this way. They had a topic and they're asking about it to the people they want to hear from. If you want to see something different and have 'substantial conversation' on what you're looking for, make you own. Jeezus cripes.