Is vore sexual to you?

by **justinrpg** » Fri Mar 08, 2019 8:18 pm

Okay, so I have heard a few of you mention "non sexual vore" and vore is sexual to me.

I mean I use vore to stimulate my sexual arousal, to achieve orgasms, and to enhance my sexuality.

However, I learned that it is not always sexual for everybody.

So this raises the question. Is vore sexual to you? Why or why not?

by **Merodi** » Fri Mar 08, 2019 8:37 pm

Nah, not really. If it's a sexual scene in itself, with a couple doing it, I might see it as kinda sexy, but usually, I just like it in a non-sexual way.

by **ArcaneSigil** » Fri Mar 08, 2019 8:56 pm

Sometimes yes, othertimes not so much.

by **Orbstuffed** » Fri Mar 08, 2019 10:14 pm

I don't really jack off to vore like most of y'all do. At all. I see it as more of a niche for me.

by **GBBG** » Fri Mar 08, 2019 10:48 pm

Yes. I'm pretty sure the reason is because it gives me a boner. :-D

by **coop500** » Fri Mar 08, 2019 11:35 pm

It's a non-sexual thing for me and I feel the main reason is I have zero interest in sexual activities. It may sound weird but... that 'part' of me just never seemed to activate. I have no sexual desire or attraction. Vore is instead a platonic comfort thing for me, as I have had a somewhat stressful childhood and even current life, the comfort and idea of a safe, soft vore scene with a nice male predator protecting me or a child he finds in his belly is an endearing one. I also view it as a gentle hug of sorts.

by **cranberryknights1** » Sat Mar 09, 2019 12:26 am

Yeah for me it is I mean its not the only thing I like or am turned on by. I am attracted to the person regardless its just a type of fantasy I have about them.I have said before I am way too attracted to other women to not be aroused by them without vore that part of it just makes it more kinky I guess.Sense I am not into violent or fatal types of vore I can relate to people who view vore as non sexual and who just see it as being as close and intimate with someone as possible sense theres a lot of those feelings involved in my personal fantasies as well.

by **RiffRaff** » Sat Mar 09, 2019 12:38 am

When I come to this website, I'd say I'm usually looking for something on the more sexual side. In general, I'd say sometimes it is, sometimes it's not. I agree with the sentiment that it can be a rather comforting thought, being safe inside someone, warm, and away from the outside world. On rougher nights, it even helps me fall asleep.

by **Etron** » Sat Mar 09, 2019 11:38 am

I've always felt that the answer to this question for me is both yes and no. I've never specifically viewed vore (or macro/growth in my case) as sexual, but it's always been arousing for me. At the same time, incorporating sexual things into vore usually kind of turns me off instead of on, depending. I find it more exciting when a picture is just vore than I do when it's vore with an underwear bulge (or more/otherwise). I enjoy both, but putting them together makes it feel like too much is going on to adequately "focus" on enjoying it, to me.

Though on the other hand, I've never been particularly "sexual" in the first place, seeing as I forayed into fetishes before ever looking at regular porn. So I kind of have a different perspective on things. Sex is icky to me, but I definitely have some kind of sexuality. It's just rooted in anthros eating things and steadily growing in size instead of looking at genitals. Closest thing to normal I have is breast fetishism.

In a way, to me vore isn't sexual, vore itself IS sex. If that makes sense.

by **sweetladyamy** » Sat Mar 09, 2019 5:32 pm

I think I can see Etron's POV on this, though it isn't really mine.

I voted 'usually is but not always' because I can look at vore in some instances and not be aroused by it. If I am seeking vore content, however, I am usually looking for some sort of release, but I also seek out non-vore content for the same at times.

There's definitely more to me than a silly, pretty girl that is looking to be eaten...

by **157and493** » Sun Mar 10, 2019 5:06 am

It is impossible for me to NOT see vore in a sexual sense. Because of my sexual attraction to vore I cannot watch things like “Attack On Titan,” since all the titans are nude males it feels like watching gay porn to me... and I am straight.

by **Ruthborn** » Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:19 am

Yes, I always see a sexual element in vore. Both are quite literally one person's being entering another person's being to fulfill a natural purpose. They are both involved in the natural circle of life (one begins it, one ends it). And they both are forms of extreme intimacy.

by **PhantomWolf** » Thu Oct 29, 2020 6:54 am

It's LITERALLY a Sexual fetish. In the definition of "Vorarephilia", it states "Erotic Desire" that's just a synonym for sexual fetish

by **Slappy** » Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:17 pm

PhantomWolf wrote:It's LITERALLY a Sexual fetish. In the definition of "Vorarephilia", it states "Erotic Desire" that's just a synonym for sexual fetish

Then what would you call it when someone enjoys vore materials without it giving them sexual urges?

Chat Profile · by **Artemis** » Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:38 pm

I think it's good and healthy to be able to disassociate the act from the fetish.

When I see the T-Rex in Jurassic Park eat a dude, it doesn't do anything for me because the T-Rex is not a pretty woman. I'm not attracted to the T-Rex on a basic level. Yet, I can still find the scene cool. When Tom eats Jerry, that doesn't do anything for me either because they're both too animal for me to even begin to find them attractive.

And yet I can enjoy them because I've got my feet anchored to the ground and I recognize the way these scenes were meant to be viewed (Not for masturbation).

To me, a failure to be able to separate the act from the fetish is akin to a foot fetishist who simply can't be around barefoot people without squirming and won't stop staring at any "revealing" shoes. Or a stuffing fetishist who won't stop making off comments while eating with someone, or can't eat with others because they get hot and bothered. It just strikes me as a bad way to be.

by **TheKawaiiCommie** » Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:03 pm

Yes, I enjoy vore as a sexual fetish. It's arousing. However, what separates "vore media" from "media including characters being eaten" is often a pretty huge rift. Not saying I haven't gotten tingly over things that weren't meant to be inherently sexual, but I'm not the sort to go around classifying scenes from monster movies as vore etc.. I think the same can be said of any fetish. As with the feet and stuffing examples above, there's always going to be things that inadvertently turn people on. That's just a fact of life. Many people are Certified Sex Weirdos in one way or another. There's nothing exceptional or derisible about that. What actually does tell you about someone's character is how they cope with that. I don't really think there's much dissent on this idea. Don't be creepy and privately enjoy whatever you like.