Re: Possessive Male Preds?
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 11:57 pm
The examples were not of male preds but of "female characters that are cute yet embody something slightly off colour and make it work" or something like that. I'm not quite sure what that all even means. And if it really means just a hot female pred representing something off colour and making it work, I'd disagree and I'm not much of a female pred type of person. though I have a soft spot for F/F being pan... still prefer male preds though.
but quick thing about Christian grey and "those books". What makes them blegh is more of the normalizing/making excuses for absuive behavior. like say its BDSM when BDSM has rules and stuff. BDSM is not the actual terrorizing of another and doesn't involve kidnapping either.. at least.. wasn't the main chick kidnapped. well, there are stories that are about kidnappers and the abducted falling for them and being used sexually by them blah blah... so even if it doesn't apply to the Christian Grey series. it applies to other normalization/fetishizing of realistic abusive relationships.
This is a site about vore though. I mean. Press on spoiler to read rest. or just read the recap at the end. whatever. they are probably the same length. as I suddenly remembered things I wanted to say during the recap soo.... yeah..... p.s. bolded the most important of stuffs.
recap
(1)Vore was at least originally a fetish. So there should be no assumed morals in vore
(2)Vore is not real. It is fiction. Not reality. It will never be a reality and more than 9 out of 10 times there is something extremely fantasy-like in the vore cotnent (e.g. macro/micro or the magic stretch mouths/throats in soft oral vore that isn't an extreme size difference not to mention the magical stretchy tummies of all preds in general in pretty much any vore (in which a visible "food baby" bump suddenly appears. or forgot to mention this before buuuut, the concept that people actually retain a part of the things (or people, in vore's case lol) they eat for the rest of their lives. as Ron Swanson would say, "False". If we kept on fat from everything we ate, we'd be HUGE. all of us. no exceptions! eventually fat from x food gets replaced by fat from y food. cells die and get replaces. energy is used up as more is consumed. *sings the Circle of Life from the Lion King* . so yeah, the food (or prey in vore's case) probably would not be in the pred's body - if digested - all that long before no evidence of x food is left in the preds body. so yeah, not to be a killjoy but it does add to the separation between fantasy and reality so that's good... yeah? maybe? I dunno )
(3)people are have preferences. each person is a different individual. Each person has individual preferences that can and probably will differ from any other given person
(4)People have different comfort levels too and that is important.
(5)One's effed up or risque or whatever fantasies doesn't reflect who they are as a person as long as they have the proper reality|fantasy boundaries upright and firm. It was they say/do IRL or to other RL people (so trolling on the internet is a bad reflection of oneself as that's still RL person interacting with RL person in a non-fantasy setting) that reflects who that person is as, well, a person
6)50 Shades of Grey was bad cuz it normalized + fetishized realistic abusive situations and abused the use of the term BDSM (which again actually has rules). That is what made it problematic. At least imo. A twisted male persona/or character is not something to be ashamed of (almost all stories need a villain after all) or compared to Christian Grey if in a more fantastical setting. Like, if one reads 50 Shades of Grey and wants to daydream about Christian Grey, whatever. But if they want to go and find a guy to dom her as shown in the 50 Shades of Grey books IRL and to have an IRL partner just like Christian Grey, there is gonna be trouble ahead for them.
7)I mean let's be honest... girls who are even just the tiniest bit straight are notorious for liking aka crushin' on the main dude villains (or lady villians if gay/etc) in shows/etc that they like if said villains are even just remotely attractive. They could commit fictional genocide and they will still write trashy self-insert fanfiction about them. I bet guys do the same with lady villains. or dude villains if they're gay/etc... So honestly, females, especially females whom identify as prey (or switches) liking possessive, perhaps even cruel male preds shouldn't be of a surprise to anyone. There are quite a lot of dudes into cruel female preds so yeah... that too....prey folk tend to be sub-ish and pred folk tend to be domm-ish. and switches and observers (or purely content creators) are more of a mixed bag...
So "Possessive Male Preds?" as a question like in the title of the thread?
the answer is "Yes."
They ain't for everybody but they exist and they aren't goin' anywhere.
Feel almost like a wrote a vore Ted Talk or something. Need to do something trashy or see/read something trashy now to bleach my brain of seriousness or whatever. I hate being serious :/ (damn. it's 1 am now. I really wanted to do Art too :/.... Now I feel I should try and sleep or something. But I'm kinda anxious for being so... I dunno... serious? IDK. >_<
but quick thing about Christian grey and "those books". What makes them blegh is more of the normalizing/making excuses for absuive behavior. like say its BDSM when BDSM has rules and stuff. BDSM is not the actual terrorizing of another and doesn't involve kidnapping either.. at least.. wasn't the main chick kidnapped. well, there are stories that are about kidnappers and the abducted falling for them and being used sexually by them blah blah... so even if it doesn't apply to the Christian Grey series. it applies to other normalization/fetishizing of realistic abusive relationships.
This is a site about vore though. I mean. Press on spoiler to read rest. or just read the recap at the end. whatever. they are probably the same length. as I suddenly remembered things I wanted to say during the recap soo.... yeah..... p.s. bolded the most important of stuffs.
Spoiler: show
recap
(1)Vore was at least originally a fetish. So there should be no assumed morals in vore
(2)Vore is not real. It is fiction. Not reality. It will never be a reality and more than 9 out of 10 times there is something extremely fantasy-like in the vore cotnent (e.g. macro/micro or the magic stretch mouths/throats in soft oral vore that isn't an extreme size difference not to mention the magical stretchy tummies of all preds in general in pretty much any vore (in which a visible "food baby" bump suddenly appears. or forgot to mention this before buuuut, the concept that people actually retain a part of the things (or people, in vore's case lol) they eat for the rest of their lives. as Ron Swanson would say, "False". If we kept on fat from everything we ate, we'd be HUGE. all of us. no exceptions! eventually fat from x food gets replaced by fat from y food. cells die and get replaces. energy is used up as more is consumed. *sings the Circle of Life from the Lion King* . so yeah, the food (or prey in vore's case) probably would not be in the pred's body - if digested - all that long before no evidence of x food is left in the preds body. so yeah, not to be a killjoy but it does add to the separation between fantasy and reality so that's good... yeah? maybe? I dunno )
(3)people are have preferences. each person is a different individual. Each person has individual preferences that can and probably will differ from any other given person
(4)People have different comfort levels too and that is important.
(5)One's effed up or risque or whatever fantasies doesn't reflect who they are as a person as long as they have the proper reality|fantasy boundaries upright and firm. It was they say/do IRL or to other RL people (so trolling on the internet is a bad reflection of oneself as that's still RL person interacting with RL person in a non-fantasy setting) that reflects who that person is as, well, a person
6)50 Shades of Grey was bad cuz it normalized + fetishized realistic abusive situations and abused the use of the term BDSM (which again actually has rules). That is what made it problematic. At least imo. A twisted male persona/or character is not something to be ashamed of (almost all stories need a villain after all) or compared to Christian Grey if in a more fantastical setting. Like, if one reads 50 Shades of Grey and wants to daydream about Christian Grey, whatever. But if they want to go and find a guy to dom her as shown in the 50 Shades of Grey books IRL and to have an IRL partner just like Christian Grey, there is gonna be trouble ahead for them.
7)I mean let's be honest... girls who are even just the tiniest bit straight are notorious for liking aka crushin' on the main dude villains (or lady villians if gay/etc) in shows/etc that they like if said villains are even just remotely attractive. They could commit fictional genocide and they will still write trashy self-insert fanfiction about them. I bet guys do the same with lady villains. or dude villains if they're gay/etc... So honestly, females, especially females whom identify as prey (or switches) liking possessive, perhaps even cruel male preds shouldn't be of a surprise to anyone. There are quite a lot of dudes into cruel female preds so yeah... that too....prey folk tend to be sub-ish and pred folk tend to be domm-ish. and switches and observers (or purely content creators) are more of a mixed bag...
So "Possessive Male Preds?" as a question like in the title of the thread?
the answer is "Yes."
They ain't for everybody but they exist and they aren't goin' anywhere.
Feel almost like a wrote a vore Ted Talk or something. Need to do something trashy or see/read something trashy now to bleach my brain of seriousness or whatever. I hate being serious :/ (damn. it's 1 am now. I really wanted to do Art too :/.... Now I feel I should try and sleep or something. But I'm kinda anxious for being so... I dunno... serious? IDK. >_<