Another question for people who like vore non-sexually

[157and493]

I think it is safe to say that most vore pictures/stories/animations are created with a sexual intent behind them. This is understandable of course since most people seem to like vore in a sexual way. However, I have also come to realize that there is a good handful of people who do not like vore sexually and instead like it for other reasons.

So my question to people who like vore non-sexually is this: “Does seeing sexualized vore make you uncomfortable since you like it non-sexually?”

I ask this question because I notice that some people in real life tend to dislike it when things that they see as being non-sexual are sexualized, so I was wondering if this applied to vore as well.

[3rasvok]

I think it is safe to say that most vore pictures/stories/animations are created with a sexual intent behind them. This is understandable of course since most people seem to like vore in a sexual way. However, I have also come to realize that there is a good handful of people who do not like vore sexually and instead like it for other reasons.

So my question to people who like vore non-sexually is this: “Does seeing sexualized vore make you uncomfortable since you like it non-sexually?”

I ask this question because I notice that some people in real life tend to dislike it when things that they see as being non-sexual are sexualized, so I was wondering if this applied to vore as well.

It doesn't make me uncomfortable, it's just a turn off takes away from the vore when an oversexualized bimbo is the pred. It's fine when it's done well like the pred trying to seduce the prey for example. For me, vore is about eating and not the characters having the hots for each other.

[coop500]

It does make me uncomfortable yes, but usually, I just click away.
These days though I don't really even look for vore content, I've come to accept that my prefs are just too unusual to be found elsewhere and just stick to making my own content.

[rugli]

Vore far as I'm concerned is sexual in and onto itself far as i'm concerned. Especially if its human on human vore. The sole expectations are when it occurs in mainstream cartoons or film.
Heck even vampireism is sexual far as i'm concerned unless the film is PG-13 rated.

[cranberryknights1]

I like it as both so it does not really bother me however I am not into vore images or stories that are extremely sexualized. I do get aroused by vore stories but at the same time I read them for more than just straight up porn or something as well. The vore itself is all I really need to be turned on by without there being actual sex taking place.

[Birichino]

I like vore erotically, but anything too aggressively sexual is a turn-off, anyway.

[sweetladyamy]

...I've come to accept that my prefs are just too unusual to be found elsewhere and just stick to making my own content.

I unfortunately, can relate. Most of the content I peruse is in my head these days, or if I get the chance to, written out.
Like, my story series with my OC Alexis I am 88% finished with the next chapter on. Hopefully, I'll get it finished soon!
(Yeah, creative drive is another issue I have altogether in this regard)


As for me, there are times when I do view vore in a non-sexual way, but it's not a common occurrence.

[StarlingJay]

...“Does seeing sexualized vore make you uncomfortable since you like it non-sexually?”

I ask this question because I notice that some people in real life tend to dislike it when things that they see as being non-sexual are sexualized, so I was wondering if this applied to vore as well.

Well, your question is a little confusing because it can be interpreted in a couple of different ways. Are you referring to people who are not and cannot be turned on by vore in any scenario, and only see vore as some kind of quirky, platonic hobby? Or are you talking about people who do not like sexual things in vore, but are still turned on by vore despite it not being inherently sexual?

I would fit into the latter camp, if it's the scenario you meant. Seeing sexualized vore makes me click off of the content because I don't like sexual things or nudity (a character being aroused by an act of vore, with no genitals in view and no further details added, is my limit for what I can enjoy when it comes to vore content). Seeing vore sexualized does in fact make me uncomfortable, so I avoid those things. However, seeing non-sexual vore can make me aroused. For example, nude giants voring people with their dicks in view would be uncomfortable for me and a turnoff. But something that has nothing to do with sexual content, like a vore scene in a kid's movie (take that vore scene in Ice Age 4 where the raptor villain swallows Sid's granny for example), or a nice human mawshot, etc. could possibly turn me on. So yeah, I definitely dislike seeing vore, which I interpret as non-sexual, being sexualized, and I avoid works that sexualize it... if that was the correct interpretation of the question you were asking.

[Devourerita]

While I like vore sexually (as in, I get a boner if I like the image/story/whatever), I don't like sexualized vore.

Let's put it this way: If the pred is eating the prey out of hunger/because he can/because it's his job there will be no problem, but if he eats the prey to get sexually aroused/to masturbate/because it's his fetish in character then I'll 99% won't like it (however, I like when the pred enjoys eating the prey, as long as it's not sexual).

I also try to avoid NSFW stuff, except if I really like the pred, and even then, the image must be good and the NSFW stuff shouldn't overpower the vore material, otherwise, I'll just try to skip as much as possible and save only the vore part.

This is caused by my asexuality

[Trollfacegesicht]

Pretty much what StarlingJay and Devourerita said. If I see genitals or if there is sex in the story or on the picture, thats a big turn off for me.

[Artemis]

“Does seeing sexualized vore make you uncomfortable since you like it non-sexually?”

I ask this question because I notice that some people in real life tend to dislike it when things that they see as being non-sexual are sexualized, so I was wondering if this applied to vore as well.

Hum... Yeah! Sometimes. The scene from Jurassic Park where like, the T-Rex eats the dude is really cool, but like. It'd be pretty uncomfortable if the T-Rex had a gigantic boner the entire time. The things that make me enjoy vore in a sexual manner are very different from the things that make me enjoy vore non-sexually. I enjoy vore non-sexually because people getting eaten is objectively scary, domineering and objectifying in a way that lends itself very well to horror and hard action scenes. It can also be pretty hilarious? In that respect, I think most people are capable of enjoying vore non-sexually.

[Avarice1of2]

I really do not like vore in a sexual manner. I will only accept my mate sexualizing it. In that they are also the pred. If I decide someone is food, if they decide to wank it, well I will lose my meal.

[Scrumptious]

...“Does seeing sexualized vore make you uncomfortable since you like it non-sexually?”

I ask this question because I notice that some people in real life tend to dislike it when things that they see as being non-sexual are sexualized, so I was wondering if this applied to vore as well.

Well, your question is a little confusing because it can be interpreted in a couple of different ways. Are you referring to people who are not and cannot be turned on by vore in any scenario, and only see vore as some kind of quirky, platonic hobby? Or are you talking about people who do not like sexual things in vore, but are still turned on by vore despite it not being inherently sexual?

You're right that there are different ways in which this can be interpreted. That's generally inherent in just about any 'or' question that can be posed on this forum.

For me, it is a sexual turn on, but it is easy for me to be turned off by over-sexualization. Primarily I find that the character who is the focus of the author's desire is shown with unnaturally large breasts and/or puffy lips. I put that down to the author's maturity, but immature authors also need an outlet, so I take it with a grain of salt. So, I guess I'm generally in the camp with you, Devourerita and Trollfacegesicht.

However, the way I read 157and493's question, it is aimed at those who do experience a 'fascination' (let's say), but would not (themselves) call that fascination sexual.