Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Keep our community informed! This forum is for discussing and sharing vore-related information. Post any relevant material and/or links here, and engage in conversations!
Forum rules
This is for general discussion, if you found something you want to post, please use one of the upload forum, if you made something and want to share them, please use the work to be shared forum!

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby ReptileKing23 » Sat May 14, 2022 11:56 am

Mecho wrote:Kaa is a boring pred

Snakes in general are boring as preds


*GASP* this is completely ironic seeing as snakes are literally the most popular vore pred AND the only creature that's capable of IRL vore :D
User avatar
ReptileKing23
Somewhat familiar
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2018 7:50 pm

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby GREGOLE » Sat May 14, 2022 12:32 pm

AND the only creature that's capable of IRL vore :D


What about fish, monitor lizards, gila monsters, most chameleons, most predatory birds, most nonavian theropod dinosaurs, certain cetaceans, frogs, toads, several types of salamander, sea anemones, jellyfish, several types of hydrozoa and numerous carnivorous plants?
User avatar
GREGOLE
Intermediate Vorarephile
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby fieldmousse » Sat May 14, 2022 12:47 pm

ReptileKing23 wrote:Hey it's a great song! :D


I've actually never heard it before - too young :/
who's the guy who made that cringey "vore" song. Maybe someone should tell him to make "I wanna vore you up" XD
User avatar
fieldmousse
Participator
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 12:34 am

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby ReptileKing23 » Sat May 14, 2022 12:52 pm

GREGOLE wrote:
AND the only creature that's capable of IRL vore :D


What about fish, monitor lizards, gila monsters, most chameleons, most predatory birds, most nonavian theropod dinosaurs, certain cetaceans, frogs, toads, several types of salamander, sea anemones, jellyfish, several types of hydrozoa and numerous carnivorous plants?



I meant in terms of swallowing a HUMAN whole and alive >.>
User avatar
ReptileKing23
Somewhat familiar
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2018 7:50 pm

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby GREGOLE » Sat May 14, 2022 1:03 pm

Then you've still got several dinosaurs, megalania, azhdarchid pterosaurs, certain cetaceans, several types of fish, including but not limited to giant groupers and catfish, and debateably large crocodilians.

Also, there is no recorded instance of a snake swallowing a person alive.
User avatar
GREGOLE
Intermediate Vorarephile
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby ReptileKing23 » Sat May 14, 2022 1:23 pm

GREGOLE wrote:.

Also, there is no recorded instance of a snake swallowing a person alive.


Actually, yes there is >.>
User avatar
ReptileKing23
Somewhat familiar
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2018 7:50 pm

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby GREGOLE » Sat May 14, 2022 1:42 pm

Then I'm gonna ask you to cite your sources.
User avatar
GREGOLE
Intermediate Vorarephile
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby LightDragon » Sat May 14, 2022 9:19 pm

GREGOLE wrote:Then you've still got several dinosaurs, megalania, azhdarchid pterosaurs, certain cetaceans, several types of fish, including but not limited to giant groupers and catfish, and debateably large crocodilians.

Also, there is no recorded instance of a snake swallowing a person alive.


Snakes swallowing humans is a thing, unfortunately.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/anim ... -indonesia

Well, now, if you are talking of specifically swallowing alive, there is effectively no recorded instance. Snakes (and... the large majority of predators) take care to kill their preys before swallowing them. I guess their stomachs are not as resistant as the cartoons on this site.
But when it comes to swallowing at all, there are definitely cases of snakes eating humans.
LightDragon
Participator
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 3:16 am

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby GREGOLE » Sat May 14, 2022 9:21 pm

Well, now, if you are talking of specifically swallowing alive


I did. That's why I took the time to add "alive" to my statement. It's not something you can just ignore.
User avatar
GREGOLE
Intermediate Vorarephile
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby KittyBoi » Sat May 14, 2022 9:42 pm

Vorepun wrote:Most burp onomatopoeia break my immersion to the point where I avoid art that has burping in it *just* so I can avoid seeing 'braaaaaaap'.

That's all I have. I don't really think anything anyone else likes is dumb or whatever, I can hardly talk. I like soul digestion so...I really can't say shit. xD;


You know, I agree largely, lmao. A lot of my clients LOVE it to the point of deeming it essential, so I make do :P.

My big unpopular opinion is that Micro/Macro stuff really takes the interesting parts of vore out of vore, at least for me. The tightness, the satisfaction, the effort, the intimacy... I think that those aspects are all lost when the size difference is enough to be considered Micro. When there's Mass Vore to try and meet those details still, I think it strips things of that intimacy regardless.
It's not hard to be greedy... a little bit of overindulgence goes a very long way.

Feel free to support me: https://subscribestar.adult/kittyboi
User avatar
KittyBoi
Somewhat familiar
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:40 pm

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby Mecho » Sun May 15, 2022 6:30 am

ReptileKing23 wrote:
Mecho wrote:Kaa is a boring pred

Snakes in general are boring as preds


*GASP* this is completely ironic seeing as snakes are literally the most popular vore pred AND the only creature that's capable of IRL vore :D



That is what makes them so boring. It's not really the snakes that bothers me. (They are truly cool animals!) But the fact it's been done so many times. I don't like when something is predictable and/or not new. It got the "watching the same show on repeat" effect on me. Also, vore is not real so really. It don't need to make any sense what so ever :D

Though! If an artist put in some new elements to it, it can be fun again :)
User avatar
Mecho
---
 
Posts: 1608
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: sweden

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby Skulker » Sun May 15, 2022 1:24 pm

I don’t mind snakes, I just hate it when it’s Kaa or a shot for shot copy of what Kaa did.
Skulker
Somewhat familiar
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:46 pm

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby ProfessorET » Fri Jun 10, 2022 5:50 pm

AeriaGloris wrote:
Ixtili wrote:On the one hand I hate to be that girl on the other hand it's my nature to be that girl and thus: we actually are computers, merely biological computers and we probably could eventually learn how to manufacture and save memories given enough research into either neuroscience, genetic engineering or artificial intelligence. Whether an identical copy of a person can be considered the same person is it's own debate though. But also Baccano is a good anime and Wolverine and Deadpool and Natsuki Subaru and Frisk/Chara are fun characters. So don't be hating on fictional immortality or timeline reset powers like that.


It's part of the debate. Ye Olde Teleportation Paradox. This is never questioned in reformation stories. Characters all act like it's a minor inconvenience being vored. "See you tomorrow!". It's bullshit I tell you! If anyone stopped and wondered if their consciousness would continue post-vore they may think twice about jumping down their sibling's throat.

Timeloop content is different. If someone wrote a Ground Hog day story where Bill Murray's character was eaten by a different person each day, I'd be totally fine with it! [Disclaimer: Timeloops have become an overused trope recently]



In my story, I haven’t gotten to this portion of the explanation for reformation, but I actually have a good explanation for this: We are all projections of a black hole! Think about it, what this universe is, is actually a series of 3D projections of a 4D projector. If you have a regular sphere, and you cast a light on it, you get a circle on the ground… but if you cast some 4 dimensional light source on a 4 dimensional object, you would get a 3 dimensional shadow. Our true nature is not the mere 3 dimensional shadows we inhabit, but the 4 dimensional character (our “soul”) going across the lens we can only see as our galaxy’s black hole. We cannot see the “light” of a black hole because we are the light. When our light is destroyed in the world, just as the film is not affected on a projector when the screen is covered up, so too our soul is not lost.There is never a loss of consciousness, only a perceived loss. We are so in tune with this Plato’s Cave reality that we’ve built up for ourselves that we may not be able see anything else, so we may choose to inhabit other creatures instead until we are ready to move on with our story, hence the sentient fat explanation, and eventually the explanation for what the reformation machines actually are (just regular metal tubes which house a contained shard of a black hole).
User avatar
ProfessorET
Been posting for a bit
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:57 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby Rejnka » Fri Jun 10, 2022 8:13 pm

ProfessorET wrote:
AeriaGloris wrote:
Ixtili wrote:On the one hand I hate to be that girl on the other hand it's my nature to be that girl and thus: we actually are computers, merely biological computers and we probably could eventually learn how to manufacture and save memories given enough research into either neuroscience, genetic engineering or artificial intelligence. Whether an identical copy of a person can be considered the same person is it's own debate though. But also Baccano is a good anime and Wolverine and Deadpool and Natsuki Subaru and Frisk/Chara are fun characters. So don't be hating on fictional immortality or timeline reset powers like that.


It's part of the debate. Ye Olde Teleportation Paradox. This is never questioned in reformation stories. Characters all act like it's a minor inconvenience being vored. "See you tomorrow!". It's bullshit I tell you! If anyone stopped and wondered if their consciousness would continue post-vore they may think twice about jumping down their sibling's throat.

Timeloop content is different. If someone wrote a Ground Hog day story where Bill Murray's character was eaten by a different person each day, I'd be totally fine with it! [Disclaimer: Timeloops have become an overused trope recently]



In my story, I haven’t gotten to this portion of the explanation for reformation, but I actually have a good explanation for this: We are all projections of a black hole! Think about it, what this universe is, is actually a series of 3D projections of a 4D projector. If you have a regular sphere, and you cast a light on it, you get a circle on the ground… but if you cast some 4 dimensional light source on a 4 dimensional object, you would get a 3 dimensional shadow. Our true nature is not the mere 3 dimensional shadows we inhabit, but the 4 dimensional character (our “soul”) going across the lens we can only see as our galaxy’s black hole. We cannot see the “light” of a black hole because we are the light. When our light is destroyed in the world, just as the film is not affected on a projector when the screen is covered up, so too our soul is not lost.There is never a loss of consciousness, only a perceived loss. We are so in tune with this Plato’s Cave reality that we’ve built up for ourselves that we may not be able see anything else, so we may choose to inhabit other creatures instead until we are ready to move on with our story, hence the sentient fat explanation, and eventually the explanation for what the reformation machines actually are (just regular metal tubes which house a contained shard of a black hole).

We understand black holes better than we understand consciousness.
Big nerd here to write cute vore. Switch.
User avatar
Rejnka
Been posting for a bit
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:06 pm

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby ProfessorET » Fri Jun 10, 2022 9:23 pm

Rejnka wrote:
ProfessorET wrote:
AeriaGloris wrote:
It's part of the debate. Ye Olde Teleportation Paradox. This is never questioned in reformation stories. Characters all act like it's a minor inconvenience being vored. "See you tomorrow!". It's bullshit I tell you! If anyone stopped and wondered if their consciousness would continue post-vore they may think twice about jumping down their sibling's throat.

Timeloop content is different. If someone wrote a Ground Hog day story where Bill Murray's character was eaten by a different person each day, I'd be totally fine with it! [Disclaimer: Timeloops have become an overused trope recently]



In my story, I haven’t gotten to this portion of the explanation for reformation, but I actually have a good explanation for this: We are all projections of a black hole! Think about it, what this universe is, is actually a series of 3D projections of a 4D projector. If you have a regular sphere, and you cast a light on it, you get a circle on the ground… but if you cast some 4 dimensional light source on a 4 dimensional object, you would get a 3 dimensional shadow. Our true nature is not the mere 3 dimensional shadows we inhabit, but the 4 dimensional character (our “soul”) going across the lens we can only see as our galaxy’s black hole. We cannot see the “light” of a black hole because we are the light. When our light is destroyed in the world, just as the film is not affected on a projector when the screen is covered up, so too our soul is not lost.There is never a loss of consciousness, only a perceived loss. We are so in tune with this Plato’s Cave reality that we’ve built up for ourselves that we may not be able see anything else, so we may choose to inhabit other creatures instead until we are ready to move on with our story, hence the sentient fat explanation, and eventually the explanation for what the reformation machines actually are (just regular metal tubes which house a contained shard of a black hole).

We understand black holes better than we understand consciousness.


Tbh I was inspired by this article https://www.space.com/black-holes-holographic-projection-quantum-computing-study for this whole ridiculous explanation, and also the Angel Leliel from Evangelion.

Also, some unpopular vore opinions:

1. I think good writing is more important than having a unique pred/prey. If your dialogue, your plot, or your descriptions are lacking, having a unique pred/prey isn't going to save it.

2. In fiction, there is show, don't tell. In erotic fiction, I believe in feel and show, don't tell. Description of sensation along with what the characters see in erotic fiction is extremely important, that is the meat and potatoes of your short story/novel soup. My favorite written works on this website use this concept to the fullest extent.

3. In a work which is meant to fixate on a person eating another person, I want full tour every time, at least to digestion, major bonus points for disposal.

4. I don't like purely painful or purely painless digestion. A lot of people disagree and say it's supposed to be "realistic". Nothing in vore is realistic, but if it's there, it should be believable up to the suspension of belief within the crafted laws of your universe. Same goes for instant suffocation, just boring imo.

5. I like sex with the eating. Just adds a bit of spice honestly.

6. I don't like overly serious plots. A story about something ridiculous like swallowing someone whole should have a bit of humor.
User avatar
ProfessorET
Been posting for a bit
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:57 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby Rejnka » Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:13 pm

ProfessorET wrote:1. I think good writing is more important than having a unique pred/prey. If your dialogue, your plot, or your descriptions are lacking, having a unique pred/prey isn't going to save it.


If this is unpopular, then we truly are lost.
Big nerd here to write cute vore. Switch.
User avatar
Rejnka
Been posting for a bit
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:06 pm

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby TheSlimeKing » Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:04 pm

* Vore is hot, but I wouldn't want to experience it irl as either pred or prey.

* More predators should actually consider the morality of eating people alive for what ultimately amounts to self gratification.

* The vast majority of vore OCs are one note and incredibly boring characters. Give them friends, put them in non-sexual situations, let them have a personality that isn't "lol I like to murder people with my stomach".

* Vore and any other pornographic work of actual people is incredibly gross. The same thing is true for porn of characters from live action works who are drawn to resemble the actors that portray them.

* More vore art should include people cuddling with a full pred.
TheSlimeKing
New to the forum
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:21 pm

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby Winny » Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:40 pm

I can't bring myself to associate actual food and vore together. Like vore to me is pretty much sexual full stop, so actually linking it to food is weird. (But I don't mind cheese for some reason melty cheese is just awesome.)

I love cute things but SFW vore feels like an oxymoron. (A fetish is sexual, a non sexual fetish feels odd)

Vore to me can only be hot if there is some type of end, be it all the way to disposal or absorbing the prey into the predator. (Its like an unfinished book, you read an entire story and then the author just doesn't give you an ending SUPER UNSATISFYING TO THE MAX!)

The amount of threads people create about how much people hate X does not mean that the community will suddenly start creating Y content. Complaining about X is not a good way to get more of your preferred content. (Sweet baby zombie jesus, if complaining about content or subsections of our community got us more content that the complainers wanted we would be drowning in male predators. Stop complaining and get commissioning some of our wonderful artist/authors that make the good male predator content to spread around the love. And for fuck sakes leave the lolicon/shotacon people alone, they get enough flak as it is. Eka said they can stay lets not demonize people with already high suicide rates. LOVE OUR FELLOW NEIGHBOURS! Kink shaming is never okay EVER.)

Disposal is fucking hot, and the sadistic cruel nature of predators treating people like nothing is hot. (The bad guys in vore is like a total 180 to regular content, and thats a good thing.)

Mainstream love of vore is going to create massive turbulence in the future of our community, and we will be better for it. And it will allow people to get more relationships. (When vore hits mainstream media, shits going to get wild. But ten or twenty years down the road all those people looking for girlfriends might stand a better chance.)

There is already a ton of girls into vore on ekas. (The reason a lot of guys can't connect to girls into vore is because guys stay looking and creating content for guys. While girls REALLY like dem male predators. (Self explanatory, spread the content love and maybe the male and female portions of the community will actually overlap.)

Hate posting sucks. (If you can't post something positive, don't post.)

And thats my unpopular vore opinions!

Mucho love you all~ <3
User avatar
Winny
Intermediate Vorarephile
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:00 am
Location: Stalking The library

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby TheSlimeKing » Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:55 pm

Gonna be honest with you, I don't see vore becoming popular in the mainstream at all. More known maybe, but not popular.
TheSlimeKing
New to the forum
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:21 pm

Re: Unpopular Vore Opinions.

Postby Mecho » Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:57 pm

There is already a ton of girls into vore on ekas. (The reason a lot of guys can't connect to girls into vore is because guys stay looking and creating content for guys. While girls REALLY like dem male predators. (Self explanatory, spread the content love and maybe the male and female portions of the community will actually overlap.)


Maybe it got some truth to it? Got a x male friend, he was obsessed with showing me boobs for some reason. I was like "bruh, I don't care about boobs. Show me dicks!" :lol:

However...It may have more to do with the fact that desperation = very unsexy. And the sad part is that there is a lot of lonely men out there that just treat girls like some kind of queen aliens? Like, get a grip dude! Treat girls like regular humans. Treat them as you treat your male friends? It isn't that hard really. It isn't cute to be a simp in the hope of some loving.

Thank god, this is a minority :) To be clear~
User avatar
Mecho
---
 
Posts: 1608
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: sweden

PreviousNext

Return to General Vore Discussion