Slayer3345 wrote:Now, I might of missed something. I only went into this briefly. If you have something to add that I didn't touch up on, feel free to comment. I know I'm not an expert. I'm just going off what I know.
When you think about it, 1 male can impregnate say 10 females. That's 10 entire families at a time. 1 Female can only become pregnant once at a time. That's 1 family. So when it comes to repopulation and ensuring the survival of the species, you're right to observe that females are dramatically more important. This is part of why you see a lot of male-only armies throughout history. The logic is that if you suffer any devastating losses, you'll be much better equipped to recover the population in a much shorter span of time if most of your females survive, helping ensure your kingdom's survival. The necessity of this strategy in modern times for powerful modern countries with hilariously inflated populations is of course highly questionable, but if we were to very suddenly just start eating each other on a massive scale...
We'd be a lot better off from the perspective of the species' survival if it were the women doing the eating. 'Course, we'd be even more incredibly better off if nobody did the eating. But y'know--Clearly we had our reasons for ignoring that option.
But let's say that were the case. Let's say vore is just a thing and yeah we need to make sure the females we want reproducing aren't getting eaten. Biologically speaking, that just means it's smart to send the men to eat our enemy's women to protect our women--something ancient armies would have done--only with y'know--rape and murder instead of vore. So really, there is some complications there. We'd have to stop being a tribalist society in order for the amazon fantasy to truly become a reality, something that is unfortunately unrealistic from a survival of the fittest perspective.
I'm going to go ahead and coin the term Vorefare for what I just described.