curious question

[punk8895]

in your opinion from all the vore or mouth zoom ins or the inside mouth shots you have witnessed throughout the times do you think the people who make the shows know about the people who like this kind of thing and subtly try to indulge or do you think its just something they do to make it edgy?

[hmhmh6532]

...

[punk8895]

If there is actual vore in cartoons ...maybe? I am not saying that if there is a vore/implied vore scene then that writer/animator is an automatic vorephile. You can't really judge what a person's sexual preference is by a quick moment in a cartoon.
As for mouth zoom ins, I feel as if it's just used as some clever way of scene transitioning. Not really sure where it originated, but it's a thing that has caught on and has been used in several animations throughout the years. We can't really say that every single animator that has done a mouth zoom in has a thing for mouths. If it is a motif that often repeats itself in the cartoon, then that animator could be into vore, but as stated above it is really hard to decipher if he/she knows about or has that fetish.

I feel that reverse mouth shots is a stronger indicator if that person is into vore, as they are rarely used compared to the stapled mouth zoom in. But once again, we can't be certain.

so you dont think they intentionally put stuff in for the people that enjoy it

[RuffledFerret]

I imagine there are at least a few people who work on cartoons/movies/video games that share this interest with us. Obviously it wouldn't be a good idea to go too "crazy" with their vore scenarios (as many of us as there are, I wouldn't say it's in the right numbers to be a significant and marketable audience), but at least a few of our favorite moments from our childhood cartoons may have been thought up or worked on by someone who knew their way around a glistening mawshot or teeth-lined scene transition.
Of course, we may never know. Unless a famed animator or other comes forward and admits to their strange source of inspiration, all we can do is guess. There are many tropes associated with vore anyway, as the idea of the hero being devoured and having to fight his way out of the internals of a monstrous creature has a fantasy-like feel to its situation. A minor character being gobbled up by a larger figure in a cartoon full of silly chases and quick-paced shenanigans fits in rather well; the shadows of teeth closing around the screen (with perhaps a quick gulp or burp sound effect) is just a pleasing way of ending a scene and cutting to a new one. Classic characters such as Tom and Jerry, Sylvester and Tweety, and (maybe) Wiley Coyote and the Roadrunner are perpetually engaged in chase-in-order-to-devour hijinks. This is most likely due to the simple, recyclable setup for each episode, not because the creators were voreaphiliacs.
(Not sure if you were talking about just mawshots or vore in general, but I hope this helps.)
tl;dr idk

[Kitsouille]

Hmhmh pretty much said everything. It is undeniable that there are animators with a fetish for mouths and vore but probably a small number. Sometime when I watch a show I ask myself if there's something "adult" in play or if it's just part of the art style, because let's face it, a character can yawn or scream and make a mawshot in the process without anyone in the staff to be into maws. Although sometime I have a strong feeling that there's more to it because it happens a bit too often (looking at you, Martin Mystery). Same for vore, someone can eat a lot or eat people without any fetish involved. These are extremely common tropes that are widespread throughout every media.

By the way, what does "reverse mawshot" means?

[punk8895]

I imagine there are at least a few people who work on cartoons/movies/video games that share this interest with us. Obviously it wouldn't be a good idea to go too "crazy" with their vore scenarios (as many of us as there are, I wouldn't say it's in the right numbers to be a significant and marketable audience), but at least a few of our favorite moments from our childhood cartoons may have been thought up or worked on by someone who knew their way around a glistening mawshot or teeth-lined scene transition.
Of course, we may never know. Unless a famed animator or other comes forward and admits to their strange source of inspiration, all we can do is guess. There are many tropes associated with vore anyway, as the idea of the hero being devoured and having to fight his way out of the internals of a monstrous creature has a fantasy-like feel to its situation. A minor character being gobbled up by a larger figure in a cartoon full of silly chases and quick-paced shenanigans fits in rather well; the shadows of teeth closing around the screen (with perhaps a quick gulp or burp sound effect) is just a pleasing way of ending a scene and cutting to a new one. Classic characters such as Tom and Jerry, Sylvester and Tweety, and (maybe) Wiley Coyote and the Roadrunner are perpetually engaged in chase-in-order-to-devour hijinks. This is most likely due to the simple, recyclable setup for each episode, not because the creators were voreaphiliacs.
(Not sure if you were talking about just mawshots or vore in general, but I hope this helps.)
tl;dr idk

thanks for answering and pretty much your answer is that you dont think the creators of those shows dont do it kind of intentionally toward the people who like it?

[punk8895]

Hmhmh pretty much said everything. It is undeniable that there are animators with a fetish for mouths and vore but probably a small number. Sometime when I watch a show I ask myself if there's something "adult" in play or if it's just part of the art style, because let's face it, a character can yawn or scream and make a mawshot in the process without anyone in the staff to be into maws. Although sometime I have a strong feeling that there's more to it because it happens a bit too often (looking at you, Martin Mystery). Same for vore, someone can eat a lot or eat people without any fetish involved. These are extremely common tropes that are widespread throughout every media.

By the way, what does "reverse mawshot" means?

so would you say that sometimes the creators include that kind of stuff intentionally because know about some people liking it

[punk8895]

Hmhmh pretty much said everything. It is undeniable that there are animators with a fetish for mouths and vore but probably a small number. Sometime when I watch a show I ask myself if there's something "adult" in play or if it's just part of the art style, because let's face it, a character can yawn or scream and make a mawshot in the process without anyone in the staff to be into maws. Although sometime I have a strong feeling that there's more to it because it happens a bit too often (looking at you, Martin Mystery). Same for vore, someone can eat a lot or eat people without any fetish involved. These are extremely common tropes that are widespread throughout every media.

By the way, what does "reverse mawshot" means?

the angle where the view is inside somebodies mouth looking towards the outside

[Kitsouille]

so would you say that sometimes the creators include that kind of stuff intentionally because know about some people liking it

Yes, maybe rather because they themselves like it and want to add a little touch of their own. Maybe they think "I would have loved to see that as a child" while working too.

And thank you for identifying that term for me ^^ Like it was previously said it is indeed a rarer pov and it could be a more vorish idea but the few times I remember seeing it were as a scary effect so I can't really tell

[blergle]

I've thought about this for years and my conclusion is that I don't think they do it on purpose to have anything to do with any vorish urges on the part of the creators or the audience. I think they do it to be scary, because when someone gets eaten in a movie or cartoon, it's supposed to be a frightening moment whether it is a near miss or a rescue or a death. Showing zoomed in shots brings the viewer closer to identifying with the victim, which is a scare tactic, and that would work on someone who has no vorish inclinations to engage them a little more with how terrifying the action is. With us, it engages us in a different way, so...bonus.

[punk8895]

I've thought about this for years and my conclusion is that I don't think they do it on purpose to have anything to do with any vorish urges on the part of the creators or the audience. I think they do it to be scary, because when someone gets eaten in a movie or cartoon, it's supposed to be a frightening moment whether it is a near miss or a rescue or a death. Showing zoomed in shots brings the viewer closer to identifying with the victim, which is a scare tactic, and that would work on someone who has no vorish inclinations to engage them a little more with how terrifying the action is. With us, it engages us in a different way, so...bonus.

thanks for answering in detail

[GBBG]

I think it's really tough to know. A lot of animated and CGI movies are doing it now but I think it's more about showing off the CGI than anything else.