linkever wrote:The only risk factor of an outrage would be the legality, because you know... Cannibalism is illegal. A group of people could take it to court to make vore illegal and won as they could talk about it like it is just cannibalism and encourage cannibal to meet futur victim. I don't think the judge will dive too deep into all the category of vore so yeah... That could happen.
Can't stop the signal. Strike it down and it shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
Yes, cannibalism is illegal, but if judges start overturning the 1st amendment (or the free-speech law in a jurisdiction near you) on this sort of thing, we're in for a lot more trouble than not getting our vore fix.
I'm not saying that you're wrong, because we do seem to live in times that are politically crazy - and we should vote and be active to constrain the forces that would undermine our basic rights.
I do think that laws against child pornography are reasonable, even if a friend of a friend has been caught up in something that might have gone too far against him. However, there does have to be a real crime that underlies an indictment, not just a facile slippery-slope argument. There does have to be an actual case of exploitation of a victim who does not have legal agency. Cartoon characters are not victims, and should be free to eat whomever they want, and are also fine fodder for other cartoon characters.