Can you get aroused by “normal” porn?

[Phorcyz19]

Yeah, but not as much compared to vore.

[ProfessorCat]

Porn makes me extremely uncomfortable and icky. I'm sure I could get aroused by it, but I have no interest in doing so.

[RealZikik]

I don't get aroused unless vore is at least teased.

[Datstrudel]

I can't sadly. Just Vore for me.

[Jayezox]

I'm into vore because I saw the bs in the "normal" porn not the other way around. Vanilla porn never did it for me.

[RiffRaff]

Assuming that 'normal' porn refers to actual people in sexual situations, no, I can't really get aroused by it. I can't get myself past the idea that the people I'm supposed to be getting off to are actual people. Even if there's only the smallest sliver of a chance I'd ever meet them in real life, I cringe so hard at the thought of meeting them I can't get off. I hate the idea of seeing somebody and my first thought being that I've gotten off to them before.

As for non-vore content, I can if it's not actual people, though I tend to prefer vore for personal reasons.

[sweetladyamy]

Yep, but I have pretty specific tastes in "normal" porn as well, specific scenarios that I enjoy. I have a very widely varied collection of tastes in kink. Vore is but one hue in the vast rainbow of naughtiness of which I partake.

"Vore is but one hue in the vast rainbow of naughtiness of which I partake."

Okay, I can't be the only one that thinks that's one of the best things ever said on this site, right? xDD

I agree with this, after all, I am at the core of fetishdom, a lipstick fetishist...

[Avereth]

Nope, not at all. But to be fair, I've never been aroused by normal porn.

[ihhh]

Nope.

[gullvy]

Yup, although it can be a bit boring at times. I've got plenty of other kinks than vore, too - hypnosis, light bondage, latex, etc.

[justinrpg]

Aroused? Sometimes. Orgasm? No! There must be some kind of fetish involved. Vore is one of them. However, if someone is not peeing or pooping in the mouth of another, swallowing another, crushing another, facesitting another, or there is not a major size difference, the list goes on, then I typically cannot orgasm. Even then usually not. I need to imagine the scenario with me.

The closest to "normal" porn I can orgasm on is micro having sex with a macro.

[whizbang18]

I'm generally very picky about porn. The vast majority of it to me makes me feel incredibly icky, not out of old imprinting by more conservative/religious attitudes, but because it lacks originality and creativity. I generally prefer kinky material or vore-themed artwork.

Seeing a celebrity crush in a porn video would turn me off (Not against him/her) as porn lacks a lot of originality in my book. Now drawing that same celebrity in your own artwork involving fetishes stimulates far greater imagination and thus far greater erotic potential IMO. For example, I can imagine myself on all fours in front of a triumphant or angry Sandra Bullock or Erica Cerra (Dressed as ALIE from "The 100") sitting cross-legged and looking down at me like a misbehaving dog or obedient servant and I could feel great hots over. By contrast, if either had sex tapes, I DON'T want to see them.

That's why watching a couple have intercourse is to me a turn off (No offense, just don't care much for seeing it). Now vore fetishes in artwork can be a real turn on to me. They can range from PG-13 to R+Rated in my opinion. That's why I regularly visit here but very rarely visit porn sites by comparison.

This is a very strange realm indeed.

[sweetladyamy]

...

This is a very strange realm indeed.

I've seen far stranger, trust me on that, lol
Though, any further discussion would be beyond the scope of the topic at hand.

So, any other lipstick fetishists here? Or, am I the only one? (I can't be can I??)

[Humbug]

No, but only because for some reason my brain registered genitals as "Disgusting. Stay away." Not because I like vore 'cuz I can totally dig pinups of ladies not being eaten.

All form of genitalia or just male genitalia?

All forms. Only vague ideas of why (hyperconservative sex ed internalized the wrong way is a heavy suspect).

[Tangentg]

I'm glad this topic exists wow, so people like us are out there!

I've never been aroused by normal porn and yeah I've only been turned on by this fetish before I knew anything about sex/fetish. I thought it was normal that everyone found being eaten/eating appealing, and I had no idea this was a fetish/sex-related.

[Thibs]

Can't say that I've ever been into standard porn. I mean I've seen it's boring and fake to me. The facial expressions and noises they make produce full cringe a lot of the time. Besides that I'm gay so my first experience with standard porn as a child was insanely frustrating as it mostly focused on the girl and for reasons I didn't yet understand I wanted to see the guy. After that experience I pretty much went full fantasy and found that my imagination was usually 100 times better than any porn I was going to see which holds true to this day.

[kaneruNTchan]

...

[phantom131]

I find this very interesting as I also have never found anything outside of Vore to be arousing, though did not expect anyone else to also be this way.

[Ghrelin]

As long as it speaks to my interests and doesn't contain any major turn-offs (like most easy-to-find porn does), yes. While vore is a big interest for me and always has been, it's never been a necessity or the only thing I could get off on. I'd be pretty unhappy if I couldn't enjoy regular sexual situations the same way, tbh.

[GleaningJot]

I'm a hardcore fetishist all the way. I have never had an interest in "normal" porn (or even irl sex) and probably never will, but I do have kinks that don't have to do with vore, so at least there's some variety there.