Now that was unexpected. Very well managed indeed! I thought, from the first story, that the eating was designed merely as an unexplained plot device, but you've expanded on it to reveal an unsuspected side of the teacher's personality. We already knew she did not seem "evil", but it's rare to see regret in vore. It's paradoxical that the predator ended up being one of the more "human" characters, but it works perfectly well here. She comes across as 'real', believable and, in the end, deserving of sympathy. As I said, very well done.
Yeah, I read both stories over again. I really sympathize with her. It shows how the animal in all all of us can take us over, but the humanity makes us feel guilty from the action. What do you think about Mr. Jackson? Do you think he can be trusted?
Hmm. His behaviour did change, from when he entered the room, to after the other teachers had left. That could mean one of two things. Either he was playing an act at first to fool the other, monstrous teachers - perhaps because he fears them, and/or because he doesn't want to stand out. Then he let his own feelings show when he was alone with Ms. Trinidad. Or it's the opposite: He was being his real self at first, untroubled by her having eaten someone, but then he realised what she wanted to hear, and put on an act to seduce her. After all, he came on to her when she was vulnerable and confused. She was very quick to trust him, because she needed a lifeline.
I'd like to think he's trustworthy. When I first read it, my alarm bells went off a little bit, but I allowed myself to take him at face value. I think the story does make it possible to assume he's honest and genuinely caring.
It was a good story, and I hope to see more from this universe.
On that note: You often have a lot of redundant words in the descriptions, and sometimes you don't put enough description into it. For instance "He opens the door, and closes it." makes it sound as if he's just messing with the door if you don't know the context.
Please login to post a comment.
Posted by French_snack 16 years ago Report
Now that was unexpected. Very well managed indeed! I thought, from the first story, that the eating was designed merely as an unexplained plot device, but you've expanded on it to reveal an unsuspected side of the teacher's personality. We already knew she did not seem "evil", but it's rare to see regret in vore. It's paradoxical that the predator ended up being one of the more "human" characters, but it works perfectly well here. She comes across as 'real', believable and, in the end, deserving of sympathy. As I said, very well done.
Posted by Gentle_Grounds 16 years ago Report
Yeah, I read both stories over again. I really sympathize with her. It shows how the animal in all all of us can take us over, but the humanity makes us feel guilty from the action. What do you think about Mr. Jackson? Do you think he can be trusted?
Posted by French_snack 16 years ago Report
Hmm. His behaviour did change, from when he entered the room, to after the other teachers had left. That could mean one of two things. Either he was playing an act at first to fool the other, monstrous teachers - perhaps because he fears them, and/or because he doesn't want to stand out. Then he let his own feelings show when he was alone with Ms. Trinidad. Or it's the opposite: He was being his real self at first, untroubled by her having eaten someone, but then he realised what she wanted to hear, and put on an act to seduce her. After all, he came on to her when she was vulnerable and confused. She was very quick to trust him, because she needed a lifeline.
I'd like to think he's trustworthy. When I first read it, my alarm bells went off a little bit, but I allowed myself to take him at face value. I think the story does make it possible to assume he's honest and genuinely caring.
Posted by Misasura 15 years ago Report
It was a good story, and I hope to see more from this universe.
On that note: You often have a lot of redundant words in the descriptions, and sometimes you don't put enough description into it. For instance "He opens the door, and closes it." makes it sound as if he's just messing with the door if you don't know the context.