You know since your upload of "How snake vore must to do" I cannot help but notice the passive aggressiveness in your titles of choice with some of the pictures involving vore since then.
Of course since your pictures involving vore since then have been commissions the possibility is there that you are maybe an artist that gives a chance for the commissioner to title the picture they paid for, if they want to and have an idea what they want the picture to be called. However even if that is or not the case the passive aggressive element in some of the titles is noticeable.
It as if you still cogitate on your statement you made back then with the upload of that picture (How snake vore must to do) and you are still vexed about reasons given against it in some ways. And now since then you have been giving some under-the-table jabs at those with different preferences to you if they may happen upon the pictures through the titles.
Well if you allow me to humour you more and others seeing my comment to further elucidate on my thoughts as to why I think so, it would be appreciated.
You see I have been following Von-de-rush works for a number of years. He is a good artist and I have enjoyed many his work. He pays good amount attention to his work and to the detail in it. In that time he has made good balance of content through his own preferences and ideas with his own personal projects, and that of others through commissions made by his hand.
Then about 2 months ago he posted his picture (mentioned in my above comment) and we shared a polite discussion there in the comments section there. In short his views were that he was tired of female characters getting "preferential" treatment in vore pieces, a lack of representation of male prey and stated that he grew vexed when others countered against his claim of the seeming lack of popularity of male prey is due to an individual's preferences. Saying it is not a case in the matter.
However the vore fetish as a whole is literally about one's own preferences when it comes to the method of devouring, bulges, the scene and even the entities or characters involved for example. That is why there are so many different types of vore. One only needs to look at the search tags of this site as a good example. Every fetish in the world is about preferences in their respective communities.
Several people here and on DA (myself included) agreed on the point that is all about one's preferences.
Afterwards he made a picture of a naga brutally killing a woman tossing her body to the side, while having "tenderly" eaten man with the picture blatantly titled "Deimos' Preferences". He made this as a retaliation to women supposedly getting "preferential" in vore and of people telling him it is about preferences. However it was actually an ironic attempt considering being eaten can hardly considered "preferential" treatment, regardless of the one being eaten is a man or woman and whether they are swallowed whole or shredded to pieces then digested, which a lot of his works entail not mention in may other artists' works as well (the digestion I mean).
And now we have this picture titled "Cell absorbs Trunks, not 18". Notice the direct mention of Android 18. There is a plethora of pictures and comics made by fans of Cell absorbing her on the net and not as much of her comrades who are male. Also there is many, many other examples of fan art of Cell absorbing female characters from other franchises and people's original characters. I may be looking into this much but it seems to be quite indicative of having some resentment in a form to the popularity of pictures about Android 18 and other female characters being absorbed by Cell.
I mean no disrespect to him but it is what I think, looking at his recent posts involving vore.
Rest assured I was I was on a train commuting back home, so there wasn't much else to do on it when I wrote the comment.
Giving my critique and thought to an artist I respect regardless of the theme is not really a waste time in my opinion since it barely took a few minutes to write it up anyway.
Replying to your vulgarity however... there are better things I admit I could be doing
I just want you to know that I really enjoy your art <3
Tail vore is a really interesting and fun concept to me and it's not very commonly done! The way you draw it and the specific frames you choose to focus on are always really lovely! I absolutely adore the way you depict the prey's transition from the tail into the pred's body~
Keep doing what you are doing and thanks for sharing your work with us =^.^=
Posted by BTS 5 years ago Report
You know since your upload of "How snake vore must to do" I cannot help but notice the passive aggressiveness in your titles of choice with some of the pictures involving vore since then.
Of course since your pictures involving vore since then have been commissions the possibility is there that you are maybe an artist that gives a chance for the commissioner to title the picture they paid for, if they want to and have an idea what they want the picture to be called. However even if that is or not the case the passive aggressive element in some of the titles is noticeable.
It as if you still cogitate on your statement you made back then with the upload of that picture (How snake vore must to do) and you are still vexed about reasons given against it in some ways. And now since then you have been giving some under-the-table jabs at those with different preferences to you if they may happen upon the pictures through the titles.
Posted by Kimbunny 5 years ago Report
lol, this guy XD
Posted by BTS 5 years ago Report
Well if you allow me to humour you more and others seeing my comment to further elucidate on my thoughts as to why I think so, it would be appreciated.
You see I have been following Von-de-rush works for a number of years. He is a good artist and I have enjoyed many his work. He pays good amount attention to his work and to the detail in it. In that time he has made good balance of content through his own preferences and ideas with his own personal projects, and that of others through commissions made by his hand.
Then about 2 months ago he posted his picture (mentioned in my above comment) and we shared a polite discussion there in the comments section there. In short his views were that he was tired of female characters getting "preferential" treatment in vore pieces, a lack of representation of male prey and stated that he grew vexed when others countered against his claim of the seeming lack of popularity of male prey is due to an individual's preferences. Saying it is not a case in the matter.
However the vore fetish as a whole is literally about one's own preferences when it comes to the method of devouring, bulges, the scene and even the entities or characters involved for example. That is why there are so many different types of vore. One only needs to look at the search tags of this site as a good example. Every fetish in the world is about preferences in their respective communities.
Several people here and on DA (myself included) agreed on the point that is all about one's preferences.
Afterwards he made a picture of a naga brutally killing a woman tossing her body to the side, while having "tenderly" eaten man with the picture blatantly titled "Deimos' Preferences". He made this as a retaliation to women supposedly getting "preferential" in vore and of people telling him it is about preferences. However it was actually an ironic attempt considering being eaten can hardly considered "preferential" treatment, regardless of the one being eaten is a man or woman and whether they are swallowed whole or shredded to pieces then digested, which a lot of his works entail not mention in may other artists' works as well (the digestion I mean).
And now we have this picture titled "Cell absorbs Trunks, not 18". Notice the direct mention of Android 18. There is a plethora of pictures and comics made by fans of Cell absorbing her on the net and not as much of her comrades who are male. Also there is many, many other examples of fan art of Cell absorbing female characters from other franchises and people's original characters. I may be looking into this much but it seems to be quite indicative of having some resentment in a form to the popularity of pictures about Android 18 and other female characters being absorbed by Cell.
I mean no disrespect to him but it is what I think, looking at his recent posts involving vore.
Posted by Liatero 5 years ago Report
Just enjoy the damn art and stop looking into shit that isn't there
Posted by GassyBlossom31 5 years ago Report
At least come up with a better reply than that.
Posted by GassyBlossom31 5 years ago Report
I Don't get why. There's plenty of male on male and female on male vore around.
Posted by BTS 5 years ago Report
Rest assured I was I was on a train commuting back home, so there wasn't much else to do on it when I wrote the comment.
Giving my critique and thought to an artist I respect regardless of the theme is not really a waste time in my opinion since it barely took a few minutes to write it up anyway.
Replying to your vulgarity however... there are better things I admit I could be doing
Posted by von-de-rush 5 years ago Report
You taking the title too seriously????
Posted by Kimbunny 5 years ago Report
I just want you to know that I really enjoy your art <3
Tail vore is a really interesting and fun concept to me and it's not very commonly done! The way you draw it and the specific frames you choose to focus on are always really lovely! I absolutely adore the way you depict the prey's transition from the tail into the pred's body~
Keep doing what you are doing and thanks for sharing your work with us =^.^=
Posted by von-de-rush 5 years ago Report
Thank you ???? im glad you like it i have a lot of project yo come on a future i hope you enjoy them
Posted by von-de-rush 5 years ago Report
Im not into scat and underage but thanks for the effort i appreciate it