Uploaded: 4 years ago
Views: 6,732
File size: 38.50 KiB
MIME Type: application/msword
Comments: 11
Favorites: 56
Tags: Belly Belly bulge Big Belly botw Breath of the wild Burp Burping Consensual Consensual vore Endosoma F/M Female Pred Fish gentle Gentle Pred healing healing pred Healing Vore hero hero prey Hungry Warriors Hungry Warriors: Age of Calam-tummy hylian Hylian Prey Hyrule Warriors Hyrule Warriors: Age of Calamity Legend of Zelda legend of zelda breath of the wild link Link prey Male Prey Messy Belly Mipha Nice Pred Non-fatal Onomatopoeia Oral Vore Princess princess pred Regurgitation Soft Vore Swallowing the legend of zelda The Legend of Zelda Breath of the Wild Willing Pred Willing prey zora Zora Pred
I told you Mipha was next, didn't I? At least I kept the title from being confusing this time. Continuing on my/Nintendo of America's Hyrule Warriors: Age of Calamity hype train, we have Mipha in a story suited to her. Urbosa wouldn't be afraid to use vore as a weapon against those who are her enemies, but Mipha would more likely use it to help her friends. In this case, the line between Age of Calamity and Breath of the Wild is blurred as I take a memory from the latter came, which takes place during the timeline of the former, and expand upon it.
And no, don't expect Milink out of nowhere with this own. Mipha might get to eat Link to heal him, but I can still find ways to push the Master Ship, Zelink, even Zelda herself never appears and is only mentioned. You can't tell me that it's not canon either, as Nintendo itself recognizes it (recently there was an add for Switch where the voiceover said "fall in love" while Link and Zelda were on screen, which is just more confirmation beyond what is already provided in game). Don't try to fight me on this, I'll bury you... in facts, of course.
That's not to say Mipha's affection is ignored or fan-conned into just friendship. She made that Zora armor after all. It's just sometimes, affection like that can be one sided. And Mipha handles it better than most relationships like that on this site (and even in cases where some of you break her personality to push your agenda and do... other things, which shall not be named). Also, Milink shippers conveniently seem to ignore the problem of the aging discrepancies between the two. But enough about that, next up is young Impa!
Please login to post a comment.
Posted by derpsquid42 4 years ago Report
Mipha's romance with Link is really sad, if you think about it. Granted, Ruto did the same thing, but she was intentionally pushy. Mipha just wanted to get her chance, but then Zelda happened, and of cource, the Calamity. I know Zelink is your favorite by far, but I hope future games can give us other options.
Posted by ZeldaNoVorsu 4 years ago Report
Ruto tried to get engaged to Link by putting him an unavoidable situation where the quest item he needed was an "engagement stone" or something. Mipha at least took the time to develop proper feelings. Her story is sad, seeing as she didn't really get closure seeing as she died... which we're going to see starting... Checks watch. ...today. As for Zelda coming into the picture, I say blame Nintendo. There the ones who think every major girl around Link's age in the game fall for him, but then made the destiny rule be Zelink... and made Zelda, so I will always want Zelink even if the destiny rule didn't exist. They could always have Zelink and then give the other ladies other people to fall in love with. Or make us not Link so we can explore options that aren't bound by destiny.
Posted by derpsquid42 4 years ago Report
Yeah, now that you mention it, every adult Link game has I think almost every female of the same age fall for him, even Midna in TP. Well there's not many options in SS, only Paige, which is like her one character trait.
Posted by ZeldaNoVorsu 4 years ago Report
As a Zelink purist, that trope annoys me. They don't need to keep pushing it into every game if they're also just going to do Zelink every time... Fortunately if all goes well in BotW 2, we won't have to have that happen again! Ugh, don't even get me started on Midna... or Tech. He has... strong feelings about her in general. Also, yeah, SS has Peatrice to fill that role even though Zelda and Link much more clearly have the hots for each other from the beginning because Nintendo's like, "we got to keep this trope going somehow guys." And then someone was like, "we didn't try hard enough in SS, so now HW is going to revolve Ganon corrupting a character who is hopelessly in love with Link into a yandere who will start a whole war over it."
Posted by derpsquid42 4 years ago Report
It's like the running gag of the adult Link games. And yeah, totally forgot Cia's main purpose was to have the hots for Link. Hey, at least Linkle would probably not have fallen for him! Really surprised they never met in the story, but I guess that would have really broken her spirit. It's funny how all the other characters just silently agreed to let her be the hero for a while.
Posted by ZeldaNoVorsu 4 years ago Report
Cia was like the gag taken with a somewhat serious but also even more comical (though disturbing) twist. Linkle probably wouldn't fall for him. Instead, she would either be jealous, or as you said, crushed. She was helpful, and she came across a lot of the other main heroes, even Zelda herself! I'm trying to remember how the princess reacts to her...
Posted by Cielie 4 years ago Report
Well it is a common anime(and JRPG) trope as a whole of having the male mc have a sort of harem not-so-harem where almost every single girls are in love or have some kind of similar feeling to him.
Not saying this trope doesn't exist in other countries, love triangle is basically this but tamer, where 2 people are in love with the same one and that person need to choose between the two. Which technically, doesn't make it a triangle so the name is kind of a lie in almost all case... Except for that Shakespeare story where there is a girl who love someone, that person loves another and that another is in love with the girl who is disguised making it a real triangle instead of both of the points loving the same and fighting over it.
Posted by transgo 4 years ago Report
I think that the Zelda-link thing is a terrible idea, based on the games. Nintendos entire story plot is trying to put a couple that does not work together. 1, most princesses do not marry their guard members, because their job is not that. 2, even if Zelda does like link, he shows no interest in her, and seems to find her quite annoying. Link can be seen blushing when talking to Mipha, and if she made him the armor, they must have been in love. Botw does not dive into links relationships enough, and as a result, we do not see him interact with Mipha.
Posted by ZeldaNoVorsu 4 years ago Report
"Don't try to fight me on this, I'll bury you... in facts, of course." Don't say I say I didn't warn you.
ZeldaNoVorsu out.
First of all, arguing that most princess don't marry their guard members assumes that Hyrule operates as medieval society did on Earth. And while Hyrule is based in a fantasy setting, given what happens in Breath of the Wild, advanced technologies and such, this is not the case. Also, this Zelda tends to be unafraid to duck norms and be independent, so doing something that perhaps this more proper version of a princess would do is irrelevant. It also begs the question as to why a Zora Princess would marry a Hylian soldier as opposed to another Zora to be able to continue her family line as the oldest child of the Zora Royal Family, so that alone invalidates the first point.
Secondly, perhaps to you Link does not seem to show any interest in Zelda because he is a very stoic person, but yet he goes to great lengths to protect her, to the point where he nearly dies to do so, and at the end of several memories, it's implied he goes to reassure Zelda when she is feeling upset. That's not to mention what happens off screen, where Zelda is able to actually get him to talk to her, and they begin to bond over things like food and their roles in the great cyclic legend. And I'm not even sure where this "annoying" thing is coming from. Going back to Link's stoicism, he doesn't really emote all that much. If he did find Zelda annoying, why would he bother doing his job as well as he did, particularly when she gave him plenty of opportunities to go doing something else? Why would he let Zelda cry on him after Ganon's return when instead he could have insisted they keep running? Or for that matter, why would Zelda feel she could do that unless there were mutual close feelings between them?
Finally, as far as I know, Link does not blush in that memory. And just because Mipha made the armor, doesn't mean Link loves her back. Love can go one way or not the other. If it was mutual, she would not have indicated in her diary that she was worried about Link and Zelda spending more time together? Mipha is not as... outgoing shall we say as Princess Ruto. It also seems that she and Link have not spending as much time together since he joined the army, logically, and she ages much more slowly than he does. Link might finally be getting to the age where she feels comfortable talking to him about something beyond their friendship. If he had truly loved Mipha, wouldn't his first concern after Calamity Ganon's return would be to rescue her from Vah Ruta. Instead, he stuck with Zelda, protecting her until what was nearly his own end. And if you don't get all the memories in BotW, it may feel like Link's relationships are not very developed. But if you get them all, then his relationship with one character, Zelda, is well established and for good reason. Nintendo worked hard to set up Zelda and Link's relationship and make it work well. They have only further cemented that it is a thing after the fact and in Age of Calamity.
Mic drop.
Posted by transgo 4 years ago Report
I completely disagree. Link protects her because that is his job,no other reason. I also think that it is a bad job by nintendo trying to force it, and maybe that is why I hate it so much. Mipha had a genuine plot, affection, and relationship with Link, and I believe that Zelda and Urbosa is actually her most built relationship.
Posted by ZeldaNoVorsu 4 years ago Report
Wait, but you can't disagree completely. Some of what I said is not up for debate, unless you played some other version of Breath of the Wild that I don't know about where Link is very expressive. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by forcing it? Most of the past story is about reminding you of the relationship that developed between them, so that's not forcing it. That's just how the story goes! If anyone is trying to force something, it's you trying to force the story to go in a direction it was not written to, but it won't do so, which is why you're frustrated. Mipha does have her part in the story as well, but hers of the childhood friend. Sometimes that does develop into something more when both parties are mutual, but there are plenty of examples where that also doesn't work out. People change and move on. In the case of Mipha and Link, Link ages much faster than she does, so he is liable to grow and move on before she does. Zelda and Urbosa do have a well established relationship and backstory together. She also has a rocky relationship with her father. But the character she interacts the most throughout the entire game is Link, and their relationship develops from Zelda wanting nothing to do with him to being willing to lay down her life for his after seeing that he would do the same for her. It's a beautiful story that you're missing because you can't get over the game not letting you have a fish waifu. Essentially, missing the forest for the trees. If the relationship was so forced and bad, I would think there would not be so many other people like me out there producing all sorts of fan art and loving it as I do. You can't convince me otherwise, and unless I've convinced you, which the above argument was supposed to, I don't think this debate will go anywhere.