Posted by ChaoskampfNunc 2 years ago Report

Argonians are great for predators, nice sexy scaly bois with reptile features~ Probably a bit of snake in there ;3

Posted by braxe 2 years ago Report

todd howard wrote that first sentence

Posted by tastylittletiny 2 years ago Report

It's been so much fun watching you play this, hon! And yeah, I definitely think Argonians would be capable of soft vore, what with their reptilian/snakelike apearance~ the amount of ways that you can eat people in the game is quite insane, I agree :P

Seein your handsome Argonian eat a girl though is VERY nice. He looks perfectly suited to swallowing a poor bandit lass whole~ ah well, I'm sure there's SOME willing prey out there in Skyrim for him to indulge himself on, though I'm sure he doesn't mind the feisty prey that fight back at all~

But why would anyone resist, after all? He's the Dragonborn and has saved the world from being devoured by Alduin! So it's only fair that he gets to devour as many people as he wants as thanks for his heroism~

Posted by stearwing 2 years ago Report

I wouldn't say Skyrim holds up well unless you mod it out the arse, which I did.
No vore mods, though. Comes from my obsession with consistency within that world. A shame, really. I've been looking for any excuse to feed Delphine to Paarthurnax, for instance.

Posted by Ixtili 2 years ago Report

Actually if you play a vampire same size Vore is canon, because there is a clan of vampires known for swallowing their prey whole. If you roleplay as a Deadra or other Denizen of Oblivion such as the Ideal Masters soul vore would also be a thing and Sanguine likely would not turn his nose up at granting a boon to someone with a Vore fetish given one of his worshippers in game got off to roasting people alive. It's just that Vore as pure fetish cut off from all canon magic would not be consistent. Monsters eating people is a thing, cannibalism is a thing, messed up sorcerers who pursue magic solely to do things like recreate their fetish is a thing. But the games never go into extreme detail or anything. Tone wise you could never include Vore and be consistent with how much detail the games actually lend to that stuff. But then the same thing could be said about sex mods or mods that take the time to actually apply past lore to the game world. Or most mods in general that offer any kind of depth. The biggest issue with adding the Vore mod would likely be that it would never work for a good guy play through and that a lot of the stuff in that mod does not make much real world sense unless your playing a Mage who actively sought to turn themselves into a voracious monster. Even then the casual Vore tone of that mod is at odds with how people actually treat cannibalism in universe. Also some of the perks fly directly in the face of what even magically assisted ingestion should probably be capable of.

Posted by stearwing 2 years ago Report

I'd be careful using the word "canon" as synonymous with "exists in this 'verse", since IIRC that clan is mentioned in an in-game book - i.e. a source meant to be questioned due to the relatively low standard of scientific writing in-universe.
Similarly, I'd be careful about saying mods adding old lore don't fit the world. For me, the beauty of Elder Scrolls is that it's a perfectly normal-seeming fantasy universe with some mildly odd details until you look closely enough. Old lore can still fit in such a framework, provided it isn't pre-Daggerfall (and even with Daggerfall, caution should be taken).

To get to the point, though, I'd argue straight-up vore is an improbable thing even for a Daedra to enable.
Namira is now in charge of cannibalism (thanks, Todd), but cannibalism isn't quite eating people whole. It is much more out-in-the-open graphic and bloody, fitting Namira's sphere of wrong and disgusting things.
Now Sanguine's just a party animal. He's no Slaanesh, and his influence has been surprisingly subtle so far - nothing outlandish, just people getting drunk, high, horny and magically naked, possibly at the same time.
As for Hircine, he's a hunter more than a devourer. Kills are necessary, trophies are desired, but eating people, maybe not so much. After all, that comes after a successful hunt.
I could perhaps see it with Boethiah on account of that whole Trinimac debacle, but even there I'm inclined to argue that whole story is a poor metaphor for what really happened. Perhaps it might make sense were someone to attempt Mantling Trinimac, but that's getting into what Malacath really is and what really happened to the Orcs during the Warp in the West, i.e. Daggerfall lore and greater-than-usual uncertainty.
As for the Ideal Masters - they only do soul vore insofar as that walking into a Prince's realm is also technically vore (what with the Princes being their realms). The rest of the Soul Cairn's operation is guesswork, but my mental imagery isn't devouring souls as much as hooking them up like batteries.

Posted by Ixtili 2 years ago Report

I think your vastly underestimating Sanguines amorality, he literally has the mindset of "if you want something pursue it to the point of depravity". He's not the God of Rape like Molag Bal but that's because real Rape isn't about pleasure but Domination. Sanguine could care less about domination unless domination makes you feel good. He's not out here trying to get you to commit evil but that's not because he has any particular limits or depths he won't sink to it's because he is empowered by people giving into their own dark desires not his dark desires for them. As to the difference between eating something and using it as a battery: literally there is no difference. As to the legitimacy of the book I'd say it's probably more legitimate than most given the character mentioned in it is a vampire and the hunter he turns is a NPC you can kill in Skyrim. Also given the whole Dragonbreak thing it's honestly hard to tell how much is poor literacy and how much is the world rewriting itself on a whim. As to Deadra being capable of Vore they likely are capable of it given they are A. Shapeshifters and B. Reality warpers. The question is rather would they have the inclination to do it? The answer with some exceptions Molag Bal actually eats souls not because he needs to but because it hurts them and he's a sadist. Is likely no, but would they be willing to grant the ability to someone else with the inclination? Probably. Most Deadra aren't as inherently evil as Slaneesh or what have you. But they also are "open to new things" as long as those new things don't contradict their nature and provide them ample entertainment. Vore does not actually contradict Sanguines nature.

Posted by Predator 2 years ago Report

Can you take this to DMs instead of having a mostly irrelevant conversation on my picture? Lol

Posted by Ixtili 2 years ago Report

If the other person decides there's more to say sure, although I get the impression this might be one of those "agree to disagree" things...TES lore is like that.

Posted by DR Mabuse 2 years ago Report

A nice way to dive deeper into the world of Skyrim.

Posted by Spyro17723132 2 days ago Report

What's his name?