Well this was a punchy little piece. I was somewhat surprised that the description and tags looked more conventional than you normally do, and it seemed quite short (was it a writing challenge? Under 1000 words?), but when I read it it still felt like your style. It's brief because it's about a scene of brief, casual gratification, and without going into other things before or after, that's just all there is.
Posted by Mourtzouphlos 1 year ago Report
Well this was a punchy little piece. I was somewhat surprised that the description and tags looked more conventional than you normally do, and it seemed quite short (was it a writing challenge? Under 1000 words?), but when I read it it still felt like your style. It's brief because it's about a scene of brief, casual gratification, and without going into other things before or after, that's just all there is.
Posted by ObsidianSnake 1 year ago Report
Yes. (Nod of agreement)
Posted by Mourtzouphlos 1 year ago Report
To the challenge thing?
Posted by ObsidianSnake 1 year ago Report
This story is similar to what I wrote before I had a gallery here. How ironic that this kind of story inverts some of my better-known conventions!
Posted by Mourtzouphlos 1 year ago Report
Excuse me a moment.
YES!!!! I KNEW THAT LEVEL OF CONSISTENTLY HIGH QUALITY MEANT AN EXPERIENCED WRITER!!!!
Sorry, I just found myself unexpectedly proven right.