Archive > BloodPuma > World of Vore > Becoming a BellyMaid
Expand
Add to favorites | Full Size | Download
< < Previous
Becoming a BellyMaid By BloodPuma -- Report

“Help Wanted! We are looking for someone to fill the position of Belly-Maid. Minimal experience is required, and on the job training will be provided as needed. The work will entail (but will not be limited to) standard home cleaning, basic laundry duties, rubbing of Master’s full belly, and pleasuring Master (mostly after meals). A generous payment, uniform, and boarding will be provided to all employees. Male and Femboys need not apply.”


Sorry it took so long for me to get this one out, but at least it's out in time for Vore Day!! To be honest, there wasn’t any one big thing that slowed this down, more of the fact that I just didn’t have the motivation to do it. It wasn’t some writer’s block thing or my usual summer hibernation, more of just lack of drive to do pretty much anything… I’ll probably go into it a bit more in a blog post later, but for now it would be safe to say it may be a while before I write another vore story…

Comment on Becoming a BellyMaid

Please login to post a comment.

Comments
Lavendercake877

Posted by Lavendercake877 3 years ago Report

well aside from the sex i'd take the job :D i love cleaning and vore so long as i can listen to music i'm good lol

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 3 years ago Report

Well he's always looking for more BellyMaids!~~

ReptileKing23

Posted by ReptileKing23 3 years ago Report

Noice!

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 3 years ago Report

Thank you! And if you know anyone that looking for a job as a bellymaid, please let me know!!

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

Well, I like the reformation aspect, but seems that the device needs perfection. Makes one wonder if the woman noticed the similarities between Meals and Maids?

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

Oh, she's very much aware of it, even if it's only and a subconscious level. As her prey-slut instincts grow she'll start to see that the only really difference between a meal and a maid is the number of trips to her master's belly!! And that's why she loves her new job!!~~

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

Well, you might want a fatal tag to this, as it seems that there is a limit to the devices, and one maid reached said limit, and thus didn't reform.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

Done! After all, it's the dangers in the world that make life worth living!~~

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

Yeah - Reformation makes me wonder if Fatal or Nonfatal should be the tag to use, or both.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

Technically both, see as many other girls didn't make it~~

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

In this case, yes, but I mean in general..... because one dies, only to come back.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

That is a much deeper Philosophical debate, much like the classic Chicken or the Egg. Is it really murder if you bring them back for death?... It would take hours, if not days, of ardent debate to have any chance of coming to a reasonable conclusion, which could be interesting at the right time. But a comment section is far from the best place for such a debate.

Still, it's a very interesting question~~~

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

Yep. I like using reformation myself, especially in cases where I feel that Final Death wouldn't fit the theme of the story, like in my interactives "Camp Lucky Animals" and "Meal-Pet-Slave", where Reformation occurs after a death.

Although my "Dungeons and Monsters" might be a different story, as the Characters are basically Players playing a D&D type of game, and while it hasn't happened yet, past PC deaths have occurred, where after a Death, the Player is handed a fresh sheet, and plays a new Character that is basically the same as the old one, more or less, like a Forge Cleric player becoming an Order Cleric.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

Setting aside you D&D story setting, I much prefer to use the idea of reforming very sparingly... I feel it cheapens the whole idea of willing prey, and greatly undermines the agreements of anti-vore prey have against vore. For if it's no big deal to die in a belly, then why not just be the sluttiest gut fill you can, trying to fill as many different guts as you want would be just a normal thing to do... And for the anti-vore crowd, they really don't have any agreement against trying vore at least once, after all where's the harm... Treating reforming as a guaranteed thing destroys far too many story possibilities for my taste...

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

Just because Reformation is involved, doesn't mean that everyone wants to be eaten. In the CLA and MPS interactives, there's the possibility of Unwilling Prey - in the CLA interactive, there's a large feral bear that's been ruining hikes for the last few years, and in the MPS interactive, if one breaks the rules, they could be placed under a Punishment status that could prevent an MPS from saying "No" to doing what Master wants.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

This is true, but only if being in a belly isn't innately pleasurable. In all of my vore stories digestive juices are extremely potent and concentrated aphrodisiac. So using a belly as a punishment, or even an inconvenience really doesn't work well. My joy in vore is seeing a prey accept their place as food in the most lust filled way possible.

Though I may have exaggerated (a person flaw of mine) on just how frequent gutsluts would take the plunge in a reform heavy world, by point still would stand with unwilling prey. In a world where a belly is paradise you can visit endlessly, why would anyone want to avoid it? Though if it's a one-way trip to paradise (or could at least be a one-way trip), a great level of worry and fear would be warranted.

Though I would not begrudge anyone for have a different taste in their vore, I just my not share a taste. For me, I can't really enjoy a good vore story without a good gutslut digesting, or at least believing they'll be digested.

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

Try it from the perspective of a nervous virgin that has that little war with the instinct that says getting eaten is deadly.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

But that would only amount to nervousness to being vored, not an outright hatred to in it and preds. When everyone around you is telling you that that instinct is wrong and outdated, especially when one hears it for those that have visited a belly multiple time, one could only be nervous about their first time not a true fear of death...

Think about it like this, if skydiving was 100% safe and would give EVERYONE a high ten times greater than sex, even people who have said they'd never do it would be lining up to try it at least once. It would only be the ones with an irrational fear of it that would fight against it, but they could argue against its safety or joy from it. It could never become a movement against anything...

That's my point in the limitation of taking away the high potential of permanent death...

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

Well, there could be connected dangers - like having to reform near the site of the old body, and if your Predator is a Kidnapper that has deposited said remains in a place they have sole access to, or has control over, then one's fate could be worse than death.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

That's not a bad idea for a story, a very interesting one to look into at a later date. But at that point it's the kidnapping that the prey would fear, not that vore itself. At that point the vore is just a means to an end, no different than using a sack to kidnap someone, not the main point of the story. At that point the greatest fear for the prey is what other non-vore things their pred going to do to them, not being sent a belly over and over again… At that point it’s not really a vore story any more, just a story that has vore in it…

If you were to keep vore as the main focus in this scenario, with the qualification of infinite regens and pleasurable digestion, there’s only really two ending options. That the prey escapes or (more likely) the prey breaks and becomes a submissive gutslut for their pred. After all, giving endless pleasure over and over again with little to no downside would eventually break even the most stubborn of prey, even those that refuse to be prey. Though if you add in the possibility of permanent death or regurgitation, with the caveat that being regurgitated is very much like going through a hard withdrawal, then your possible ending opens up quite a bit. Then the option of death as an escape becomes a real possibility to end such a living hell.

After all, being trapped endless pleasure over and over in a belly with no really downsides is more of a gilded cage then a living hell.

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

To be fair, I see vore in a story like a slice of turkey on a plate - just part of the whole thing. I need more than just the turkey, than just the vore, for me to enjoy it, as that turkey might be a little dry on its own. I need a story, a meal - gravy, mashed potatoes, cranberry dressing, sweet potatoes, vegetables, a roll, and a slice of pumpkin pie with whipped cream on top - oh, and some milk or fruit punch.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

It sounds like you’ve never had a properly cooked turkey dinner. When the turkey (or vore) is done well, it’s a truly wonderful experience, more than words can convey. And there are so many different ways to prepare it that it is hard to grow tired of the many different tastes you can explore. Of course the various other trimmings help round out the meal (or story), but at its core it’s still the turkey that is the draw.

There’s a great difference between anal and oral vore, and once you throw in unbirthing and cock vore, the many different ways to prepare vore stories have only gotten started. The types of prey and predators, their physical appearances, the gender, age, and of course willingness to play their role in the vore story all are ingredients to the story. Things like inflation, weight gain, pre and post vore sex, along with all the other fetishes used would be the potatoes and gravy of the story, extras that can be subbed in and out as needed. I can understand that you may have different tastes in vore, and even a different level of appreciation for it, but that does not change the fact that a vore story should have vore as its central pillar. If you can sub out the vore with something else that works just as well, it’s not really a vore story. Though, just as subbing out the turkey for chicken doesn’t make it any less good, still it is no longer a turkey dinner.

At the end of the day, people on this site come for the vore (and vore adjacent), not the stories alone. Still, that does not mean that one should shirk on quality or passion when writing such stories!!

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

Exactly - don't know if you're a Discworld fan, but when Terry Pratchett made the first two books, he made the humor first, and slapped on a story - turns out, they are a little dry. Book three, and onward, he realized that that the humor must be supported by a good story. The result - a series that I enjoy.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

Sorry, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard of Diceworld before. And I know it’s ironic but I’m not much of a reader, I’ve only ever read two or three books in my life (real books not comics or mangas), so I don’t think your analogy would work too well. From my perspective (do to not knowing anything of this Diceworld) it sounds more like a writer that was able to get a following simply off the novelty of their stories and then got good enough to warrant their new found popularity. Though such an opinion is solely based on the analogy you put forth…

But if you were trying to make the point that the story should come before everything, including the core point of the story, then let me introduce you to the Indiana Jones franchise. The first movie was (without argument) a truly great classic, but the story takes in its whole show Indiana was all but meaningless to the story. The second movie was nothing but cliches, but still a great fun movie. And by the third one the story, characters, and action finally balance out to make a great movie. Sometimes you can sacrifice a little bit of the overall story for the core pillar of the story, but you have to be very careful not to sacrifice too much.

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

It's a give and take.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

Very much so.

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

Still, I like to see how good one is, overall.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

Then you may want to read my “Sofia's Bed & Breakfast”. Though it does have fatal vore, it does balance the fetishes and story very well!

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

I know I read the bunny farm one.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

I'll admit that one was more focused on worldbuilding than story...

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

To be fair, if one has a series, best to have something that explains like 90% of the series history, preferably early on in the writing, especially if it's set on "Earth". Otherwise, folks might operate under a wrong impression or three. I have found that one out the hard way.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

That’s not a bad way to go, if you can do it right. It’s far easier to say “explain the world” than to do it in a way that is interesting and not clancy or breaks the story immersion. Far too many novice writers do that without the experience to make it interesting, which can turn out readers…

But it’s far from the only way, nor is it the most popular way as of late. It’s also common to sprinkle little bits of the world building throughout the story, and sometimes multiple stories. It seems that it’s quite popular for readers to figure out the limits of the world as they read, rather than being front loaded with all the details they need right away. It’s the mystery that they enjoy, to discover the world rather than just being told about it. But either way can work.

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

My issue is when it reads like it's supposed to be "our world" at a certain point, only for it to be revealed years down the line that "Nope, it's not." Sadly, despite trying to apologize to this one person, they don't seem to want to forgive and forget my criticisms of their world.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

That is a somewhat fair criticism, but to some it would be called a “twist”. If the writer wasn’t dropping any hints that this wasn’t our world (with a unique change), then that is just bad writing. But if the writer did drop plenty of hints of the “twist”, then it’s the reader at fault for not picking up on it sooner. The argument lies in between, how many hints do you drop and how obvious you make them before you ruin the twist…

Will you won’t have to worry about that with me, I accept all fair criticism that is meant to foster improvement or debate. I’ll defend myself from unfair or bad faith criticism, and if they become to belligerent I’d simply ignore them.

alockwood1

Posted by alockwood1 2 years ago Report

Might continue this in a PM - this is getting a little long.

TootCore

Posted by TootCore 2 years ago Report

Loving the progression on this one. The evolution of the protagonist into a head maid to fill in Lady Joy's shoes after making Lady Joy seem like a sex goddess was a pleasant surprise.

BloodPuma

Posted by BloodPuma 2 years ago Report

Yes, that was the idea, to take the most anti-vore girl slowly become the lustful little belly-fill she was always meant to be!!~~~