Posted by MemesRUs 1 year ago Report

Of course the small one is evil.

Posted by 4thedegen 1 year ago Report

These literally look so much like mail stamps that I kind of want to put one on some mail

Posted by Jumbochamploon 1 year ago Report

I love how Alice looks like she were captured on film out of nowhere. Also, the shit eating smirk from Emily. Truly, opposites attract (so long as Alice isn't told the truth... she might not like Emily too much if she learned of how many lives she's ended?)

Posted by 4thedegen 1 year ago Report

In that case, print them as stamps lol

Posted by doomed 1 year ago Report

It what a second , how is gabi chaotic good . She consistently eats a random pizza delivery person and has killed dozens just because she was embarrassed. She’s a gluttton who doesn’t eat as bad as Jill because she doesn’t wanna set a bad example for Emily .

So with that in mind I think she’d be more lawful neutral . Also Meg being true neutral is pretty good given we don’t really see much from her

Posted by Vorelover23 1 year ago Report

If the chips are down and her family is in danger, she’d devour her enemies without second thought. And when her Pred instincts aren’t showing or being tricked into it by her Chaotic evil sister, she usually rather chill and easy-going… as far as I can tell. Don’t know every ‘nunce’ Gabi is.

As for ‘setting a bad example to emily’? *pft* she’s just waiting the day she can do all that herself. Listening to her prompted most of those scenarios, and Emily does it purely to Bug her older sister… not to mention get her in trouble for something she asked her to do in the first place.

On others, yes, Gabi is a glutton. She’s just not always dreaming about her next meal like Emily is/would be.

Posted by Vorelover23 1 year ago Report

Of the nine, how many have NOT eaten someone? Cause I can only think of one in the line up, yet something’s niggling me i am missing another secret keeper in there that i am unaware of. Please tell me Lily’s the only one who hasn’t eaten anyone and is a secret keeper.

Posted by Jumbochamploon 1 year ago Report

Lily is Samantha's cousin. And she has only eaten people from the pre-rewrite series for Samantha, where the latter was a kid instead of an adult. Post rewrite where Samantha is an 18-year-old with an under-developed body, Lily hasn't eaten a soul.

Posted by Jumbochamploon 1 year ago Report

Nevermind what I say, she has never eaten anyone. I was thinking about Jill, not Lily. Lily can't eat people, she just tries to stay out of situations like this. And having to deal with Gabi and Samantha's appetites makes it hard to avoid these kinds of situations

Posted by Altimos 1 year ago Report

Hahah... perfect <3 <3 <3

Posted by Bowyer2 1 year ago Report

Which of these characters like to eat tiny people?

Posted by Vorelover23 1 year ago Report

Pretty sure Emily would, if for no other reason than practice for finally realizing her dreams. Doing so would be “practice and training for the big day”

Posted by Bowyer2 1 year ago Report

I would love to Emily or any female characters eat tiny people in a future.

Posted by Caesar 1 year ago Report

I think I would have placed Gabi as neutral-chaotic. She just seems too gluttonous to be labeled as "good"

Posted by MasterGryph 1 year ago Report

Lily: Lawful Neutral or True Neutral. She has the highest ideals in the cast, but has failed to live up to them. An actual Good person would have called in the Police on Gabi a long time ago for the sake of everyone else.

Evelyn: Lawful Evil or Neutral Evil. The fact that she was an active predator in the past explains a lot about how she's trained her daughter Gabi to be a hidden predator and not a Good one. Living quietly now doesn't make her Good.

Gabi: Chaotic Evil (a different flavor than Emily though). None of her meals are actually against her will.

Posted by XenMon2 1 year ago Report

Yeah, not being actively murderous doesn’t make you good, being good involves doing good things. Lily and Evelyn are at best enablers and indifferent to the deaths of hundreds of innocent people simply because they don’t know them personally.

Gabi is just a sociopathic mass murderer like everyone else. She’s not approaching neutral, let alone good, just because she refuses to take responsibility for her own actions.

Posted by DoniVores 1 year ago Report

I always saw Gabi as Lawful Neutral. Her actions arent for others or herself, and she only vores people when they break her personal rules

Posted by Vorelover23 1 year ago Report

Or emily tricks her into it, like the time she asked her to eat her friends, then pulled her into trouble for doing exactly as emily asked.

Posted by Rutmen 1 year ago Report

All pizza guys looking at you:

Posted by XenMon2 1 year ago Report

She eats people for selfish reasons like revenge or to cover her tracks all the time. Sometimes she doesn't even have a reason. The only difference is that she looks for an excuse to point to so she can hold an arbitrary moral high ground over her sister.

In any case you can't be Neutral when your main hobby is spree killing. That's like the definition of evil.

Posted by DoniVores 1 year ago Report

> In any case you can't be Neutral when your main hobby is spree killing. That's like the definition of evil.

That is not the definition of evil in an alignment chart though. Evil is being selfish, Good is doing things that benefit the whole. You can kill people and still be good. It's less about appearances and more about self motive.

Posted by XenMon2 1 year ago Report

Straight from the rule book: “Good characters and creatures protect innocent life. Evil characters and creatures debase or destroy innocent life, whether for fun or profit… ‘Evil’ implies hurting, oppressing, and killing others.” “A lawful evil villain methodically takes what he wants within the limits of his code of conduct without regard for whom it hurts.”

Even lawful evil is probably pushing it since she isn’t exactly a stickler for her “code of conduct.”

Posted by DoniVores 1 year ago Report

Pretty sure they are refering to their lawfulness when they bring up "code of conduct". Well, we have different sources in either case. I don't think I'll get through to you, so let's agree to disagree and drop it.

Posted by Rutmen 1 year ago Report

Most of them would go to just pure evil lmao

Posted by blackovanossar 5 months ago Report

Gabi in "good"?